D
bklm1234 said:TTK's MBW 16610:
![]()
-bk
jiro said:bklm1234 said:TTK's MBW 16610:
![]()
-bk
Isn't the cyclop crooked a little bit?
i dunno....i'm kinda paranoid about cyclop being crooked since i had 5 different sub which ALL had crooked cyclop... :twisted: :lol:
other than that, it looks damn good to me~
bklm1234 said:look in TTK's photobucket.
kinneyrhs said:bklm1234 said:look in TTK's photobucket.
LOL you ask us if it is ready to wear w/o mods, and then you tell us to go look in TTK's photobucket?
Come on man, get with it...
amptor said:That's one thing that bugs me about most TT subs (yes I can see I know this isn't a TT model), is that the rehaut looks too shallow in them. Unless I'm mistaken, there's no TT with the correct rehaut. I own the "honpo" or "taiwan best" whatever it's called (the "new" model king has or what have you) and the rehaunt looks shallow. I'll have to look at a gen, but I thought the rehaut on all modern subs was quite deep compared to the typical and late model knockoff, short of the MBW because I've never held one of those. Correct me if I'm wrong?
No, those are the 1680 and 1665.amptor said:So that's the infamous MBW that accepts gen parts?
Nice Sub for sure!bklm1234 said:TTK's MBW 16610:
![]()
-bk
bklm1234 said:What's worse is the so-called MBW TT subs a couple of members got are not POLEX and yet they were quoted as MBW TT and of course with a MBW price tag.
-bk