• Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!

You tell me if this (MBW 16610) isn't ready to wear w/o mods

  • Thread starter d4m.test
  • Start date
D

d4m.test

Guest
TTK's MBW 16610:
MBW16610MODERNSUBMARINER1.jpg


-bk
 

Klink

Banned member, the goat does not approve
Banned
15/3/06
9,828
0
0
and a back view? :D
 

Klink

Banned member, the goat does not approve
Banned
15/3/06
9,828
0
0
and a buckle view? :D

maybe just a general all around view will do?
 
D

d4m.test

Guest
look in TTK's photobucket.
here're additional pics borrowed from Stephane
ttkmbw01.jpg

ttkmbw02.jpg

ttkmbw05.jpg

RolexSubmariner16610_MBW_800_06.jpg

RolexSubmariner16610_MBW_800_14.jpg

RolexSubmariner16610_MBW_800_18.jpg

RolexSubmariner16610_MBW_800_26.jpg

RolexSubmariner16610_MBW_800_24.jpg

doesn't the case back kill you. "Gelena", "Shitinerand"

-bk
 

jiro

I'm Pretty Popular
Supporter
Certified
10/12/06
2,857
1,104
113
Re: You tell me if this (MBW 16610) isn't ready to wear w/o

bklm1234 said:
TTK's MBW 16610:
MBW16610MODERNSUBMARINER1.jpg


-bk

Isn't the cyclop crooked a little bit?

i dunno....i'm kinda paranoid about cyclop being crooked since i had 5 different sub which ALL had crooked cyclop... :twisted: :lol:

other than that, it looks damn good to me~
 
D

d4m.test

Guest
Re: You tell me if this (MBW 16610) isn't ready to wear w/o

I think it's pretty straight. But it doesn't look centered on the date window maybe because of the camera angle. It looks like a straight frontal shot. But it might not be.

-bk

jiro said:
bklm1234 said:
TTK's MBW 16610:
MBW16610MODERNSUBMARINER1.jpg


-bk

Isn't the cyclop crooked a little bit?

i dunno....i'm kinda paranoid about cyclop being crooked since i had 5 different sub which ALL had crooked cyclop... :twisted: :lol:

other than that, it looks damn good to me~
 

kinneyrhs

Active Member
11/2/07
493
0
0
bklm1234 said:
look in TTK's photobucket.

LOL you ask us if it is ready to wear w/o mods, and then you tell us to go look in TTK's photobucket?

Come on man, get with it...
 

alligoat

I'm Pretty Popular
Certified
17/3/06
2,253
647
113
That's a pretty good looking sub. I'd still trim the insides of the crown guards and probably put in a gen crown and tube, I'm just not too keen on the crown. But I can live with the pearl/bezel insert. Good rehaut, and date window location.
 
D

d4m.test

Guest
kinneyrhs said:
bklm1234 said:
look in TTK's photobucket.

LOL you ask us if it is ready to wear w/o mods, and then you tell us to go look in TTK's photobucket?

Come on man, get with it...

look in ttk's photobucket for other pics, didn't I indicate it's TTK MBW 16610, HELLO?
 

amptor

Banned member, the goat does not approve
Banned
1/5/07
871
0
16
That's one thing that bugs me about most TT subs (yes I can see I know this isn't a TT model), is that the rehaut looks too shallow in them. Unless I'm mistaken, there's no TT with the correct rehaut. I own the "honpo" or "taiwan best" whatever it's called (the "new" model king has or what have you) and the rehaunt looks shallow. I'll have to look at a gen, but I thought the rehaut on all modern subs was quite deep compared to the typical and late model knockoff, short of the MBW because I've never held one of those. Correct me if I'm wrong?
 
D

d4m.test

Guest
amptor said:
That's one thing that bugs me about most TT subs (yes I can see I know this isn't a TT model), is that the rehaut looks too shallow in them. Unless I'm mistaken, there's no TT with the correct rehaut. I own the "honpo" or "taiwan best" whatever it's called (the "new" model king has or what have you) and the rehaunt looks shallow. I'll have to look at a gen, but I thought the rehaut on all modern subs was quite deep compared to the typical and late model knockoff, short of the MBW because I've never held one of those. Correct me if I'm wrong?

What's worse is the so-called MBW TT subs a couple of members got are not POLEX and yet they were quoted as MBW TT and of course with a MBW price tag.

-bk
 

pugwash

Mythical Poster
30/4/07
7,211
40
0
All modern Sub reps have the wrong rehaut. The only way round it would be to make one with a 2893.
 

amptor

Banned member, the goat does not approve
Banned
1/5/07
871
0
16
ahh I didn't know all this, and I thought polex usually was when the factory didn't finish the R, that's hidden anyway. So that's the infamous MBW that accepts gen parts?

off topic I'm now more glad I didn't give $380 to honpo for this watch :D
 

Jake48

Renowned Member
Supporter
Certified
17/3/06
552
7
18
Re: You tell me if this (MBW 16610) isn't ready to wear w/o

bklm1234 said:
TTK's MBW 16610:
MBW16610MODERNSUBMARINER1.jpg


-bk
Nice Sub for sure!

Good CG's.

The only thing that I would consider changing is:
The cyclops alignment (obvious)
The date wheel alignment (date does not look centered - low)
Pearl looks flat
Modern 16610 sub should have the "Swiss Made" that covers 5 minute markers not 3
Re-Lume
As far as I know MBW's come with a solid mid link braclet and I would change that to the updated hollow link bracelet.

Would I wear it - Heck Yeah!!!!! It is one nice watch.
 

kevin300z

Getting To Know The Place
30/3/06
97
9
8
So some get a mbw and some don't? I thought mbw meant accepts gen parts, 16610.
bklm1234 said:
What's worse is the so-called MBW TT subs a couple of members got are not POLEX and yet they were quoted as MBW TT and of course with a MBW price tag.

-bk
 

who2R

Known Member
9/3/07
181
0
0
@kevin,
he is talking about a member bought a mbw TT sub from another seller (not ttk) but looks like that mbw-tt-sub is not a real mbw (aka polex)

btw.....when people say mbw rolex accept gen parts...they refer to vintage model like 1665/1680 ....etc
 

fredderf1

Active Member
30/11/06
233
1
0
i just bought puretimes MBW sea dweller for only 300...anyone else get one from him?