Why are all 35-01s reps say “RUML2” when there is no such a thing?

[farbo21]

This may be a stupid question. The gen 35-01 has RMUL3 stamping/engraving and every rep
I see has “RUM2.” If they are repping why can’t they copy that?

The 35-02 reps correctly show RMAL1. Am I missing something


Gen 35-01

3E522277 AAF3 4FF6 8249 F67C3EF13557

Image 3E522277 AAF3 4FF6 8249 F67C3EF13557 hosted in ClickPix.org

clickpix.org

 

[farbo21]

Here is rep and Gen side by side. Is it pure oversight and misspelling or am I missing something?

6689BD50 50A8 47C8 9549 EAF9BB77BFDA

Image 6689BD50 50A8 47C8 9549 EAF9BB77BFDA hosted in ClickPix.org

clickpix.org

 

[QueTip]

Is it pure oversight and misspelling or am I missing something?

You’re not missing anything. It’s exactly that. The RMUL2 was only used on 055 and 061. For 035 it should be RMUL3 for 35-01 or RMAL1 for 35-02.

 

[farbo21]

You’re not missing anything. It’s exactly that. The RMUL2 was only used on 055 and 061. For 035 it should be RMUL3 for 35-01 or RMAL1 for 35-02.

I understand that. I am talking about that actual spelling as they spell it. RUML2 instead of RMUL2. Even the spelling is wrong. There is no such a thing as “RU….” Correct?

 

[QueTip]

I understand that. I am talking about that actual spelling as they spell it. RUML2 instead of RMUL2. Even the spelling is wrong. There is no such a thing as “RU….” Correct?

Correct. It’s a typo.

 

[farbo21]

Correct. It’s a typo.

That is insanity that all the factories are spelling it wrong? but they spell the 35-02 correctly by labeling it RMAL1

 

[phiberoptik]

It's a mystery why they do this.. e.g. SWEISS MADE on RM001 Tourbillon

 

[g00n]