-
Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!
What do you think of this strap on the fiddy?
- Thread starter Sperry
- Start date
not really feeling it, mainly because of those silver holes, it would be a lot better without them holes.
Looks like a fossil strap. strap does not cover the spring-bars so the combo does not look too appealing.
Sorry dude but the strap looks like an after-thought to that massive watch. It looks like it is trying to be bund style, but the leather does not go beyond the watch case and thus misses the mark. 
pineypl said:Sorry dude but the strap looks like an after-thought to that massive watch. It looks like it is trying to be bund style, but the leather does not go beyond the watch case and thus misses the mark.
I didn't want to be unkind, but that's EXACTLY my opinion.
Makes the Fiddy look piddy.
Well then, I think we have a consensus... IT SUCKS! It is a fossel strap and it doesnt fit the pins but I had to see what it looked like, I had in mind to make a strap like this but I dont think its worth the effort. The more I look at it, the UGLIER it gets! I know you guys would not hold back your brutaly honest opinions. lol
Let me see what other Frankinstrap concoction I can come up with. :twisted:
Hopefully one that doesn't make you want to puke!
Let me see what other Frankinstrap concoction I can come up with. :twisted:
Hopefully one that doesn't make you want to puke!
I know this watch is big, heavy and have a good aged look, that makes the strap look good with this watch.
But I don't like this strap, I prefer an aged distressed one, plain look.
Just my 2 cents.
Max
But I don't like this strap, I prefer an aged distressed one, plain look.
Just my 2 cents.
Max
I don't like it, the 1950 is a classy watch even though it is a big watch. It deserves a classy strap. That thing looks like it was assembled piece meal from some remnants off the floor at a saddle company, yuck. :shock: