i am looking on the forum and i would not disturb before i finish the search. I wanted to observe a comparison between gen and rep (I really like Tudor and I have often had it on my hands) to understand what differences there are and what limits the rep has. Anyway thanks for the answers, you have been very kind
The answer is ! It is a pretty spot on replica that won't be called out on your wrist very gen like . However like EVERY rep on the the NWBIG list, even those at the top in the super rep category it has a number of minor flaws . The centre pin has a hole the gen has a cap , the dial printing is a little thinner and less 3D than the gen . It had the wrong inscription in the clasp , but now this has been corrected . It is still not as sharp as it is laser edged rather than engraved . In fact all the rear of the case are perhaps not quite as sharp as gen ,caseback engravings , serial/model number on lugs .
The truth is 95% of people won't know what they are looking at . From the remaining people 99% of those won't notice the flaws ! They will need to know what they are looking for and examine the watch possibly with the gen . I as a rep buyer can spot a ZF from the gen by looking at the centre pin of the hand stack in seconds , so will experienced forum members but most people aren't us .
One problem is ZF invest a lot of effort into making their reps look like the real thing , but their QC and build quality isn't always the best look out for wonky markers etc . The one i have is spot on QC wise everything was straight . However the movement needed a service OOTB , and the people at the factory decided to leave out the caseback gasket or fully tighten the caseback. So anywhere near water would have been a leak like sieve scenario .
To be fair get a good one and it would be hard to spend a better $300 ( with delivery ) on a replica .