Pugwash said:
The movements are stamped Swiss by the counterfeiters that stamp Panerai, Rolex, Omega et al on them. Why would you believe one printed line of text and not another?
I agree with you on that one. Just because it says Rolex or Swiss made on on a rotor, does not mean that it is made by Rolex or made in Switzerland.
But if a cheap, unfinsihed, basic ETA which says "Swiss"on it and has an ETA crest & number stamped under the balance, I usually have no reason to doubt that it is either made or at minimum inspected in Switzerland.
IMHO, looking at the quality of the gears, you can often tell what is "Swiss" and what is counterfeit.
There has been several articles written by Ziggy on RWG showing the differences between Swiss and Asian movements. And yes, it seems there are some CN6497s which have a counterfeit ETA stamp on the movement.
So yes, you can't always believe what you read/see.
But in the big picture, not just the rep market, I still believe that if a movement says Swiss, than its fully or partially built and inspected in Switzerland.
A rep is already counterfeit to begin with, so its no surprise that the movement can be a rep too.
As far as whats better, Swiss or Asian 6497/8, if it really is Swiss, than I believe its better. But a well oiled and adjusted movement can keep good time no matter where its made. The 6497/8 is such a basic movement, that I don't see why the CN-6497/8 can't be made as well as a "genuine" one.
jusy my $0.02