Seamaster GMT

[zzipy]

I like the Seamaster GMT and had questions about this before I pull the plug. Please trust me when I say I have spent time before I post this. Didn't want to sound like a total noob.

I read By-Tor review and he seemed to like the Asian 21j cheaper version of this compared to the ETA Version as the cheaper had more
accurate crown size. But the newer one had more accurate sized hand.

Is this pretty much still the case?
I also see the new ETA say Automatic and the older say Chornometer. Which is accurate??

King watch has three version of this (all ETA) and I can't tell a damn difference between them (only that one lists it has AR)

Which do you recommend - Dealer/Version?


Thank You All.

 

[takashi]

Go for King/Ruby version with slight AR tint. It has good case, good rehaut. Crown is totally wrong. Upgrade to genuine crown will cost you about 50USD (crown + tube + labor).

 

[zzipy]

Thanks for the reply. But King and Ruby's best version says Automatic and not Chronometer. I could not find Autmomatic on Omega site. Is it correct??

http://forum.replica-watch.info/php...&t=15597&p=132415&hilit=seamaster+gmt#p132415

 

[zzipy]

Never mind. I founfd out that Automatic is incorrect. I ordered the Asian version.

 

[pacs man]

I have a gen black, 50 year anniversary GMT. It says "CHRONOMETER".