Seamaster GMT: Gen or Rep?

[arcadia]

Hi guys!

I'm in no way an Omega rep expert and this is not one of those crazy tests, haha. :lol:

I just wanna get your valuable input if this is a Seamaster GMT gen or not?

Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks mates!

 

[Carl77]

Looks rep to me, particularly the bezel and the subdials position.

 

[fleadepot]

no strong ar characteristic for PO models. hard to say weather datewheel is sunken or not. if it's sunken then it's a rep 100%. even though i have never seen that particular model in person the one pictured looks like a cheap type rep

 

[arcadia]

Thanks guys for the input, appreciate it. Any other?

 

[thedoover]

The date window is turned like in a gen, rather than a rep. Where the tops of the numbers are pointing towards the handstack. You dont see many reps with datewheels like that.

I cant say that there are no Omega reps like that, but I dont recall seeing any. Of course better pics would be nice, along with the chronos reset.

Update: Nevermind. I checked a TD website and the quartz has a properly aligned datewheel but wrong color. I didnt see the 21j. I have never seen a 7750 version of this one.

 

[R2D4]

The crown is wrong. This gen model has a no-happy feet Logo. This rep's subdial spacing is too far apart. The hour hand is incorrect. The GMT hand extends too far to the indice on the rep.

Not Gen I say.

 

[arcadia]

Thanks doover and r2d4, appreciate it.

Basing on your reference photo, yeah the crown is way off as well as the subdials. Below is a larger photo if anyone find other inconsistencies

 

[Bomba]

GMT hand is shorter on the gen.

 

[arcadia]

Thanks guys. Much appreciated.