Hi Folks.
Today i want to share some side by side pictures of a new ARF 16610 vs BP 16610.
Unfortunately i didn’t have a JF 16610 at hand to do the comparison.
Because of this, be aware that BP has some slight differences in their case design.
However,
As you may know the mayor change when the 5 digit production switch from JF to ARF is about the change from 316L to 904L in Material.
Therefore since ARF took over they seem to make use of the same dials, hands, insert and movement (SH) from JF.
With one single thing, which is about the clasp engravings on ARF.
These show CL10 and 93253 while JF used E06 and 93250.
Beside this, i would say ARF does a minimal better job on the case dimensions than JF.
Anyway... some pics..
Note:
the difference of 904 to 316 is hard to tell on pics, but i tried to do my very best to spot it somehow.
Today i want to share some side by side pictures of a new ARF 16610 vs BP 16610.
Unfortunately i didn’t have a JF 16610 at hand to do the comparison.
Because of this, be aware that BP has some slight differences in their case design.
However,
As you may know the mayor change when the 5 digit production switch from JF to ARF is about the change from 316L to 904L in Material.
Therefore since ARF took over they seem to make use of the same dials, hands, insert and movement (SH) from JF.
With one single thing, which is about the clasp engravings on ARF.
These show CL10 and 93253 while JF used E06 and 93250.
Beside this, i would say ARF does a minimal better job on the case dimensions than JF.
Anyway... some pics..
Note:
the difference of 904 to 316 is hard to tell on pics, but i tried to do my very best to spot it somehow.