I have the same conundrum, there has been a lot of QC issues with the LMPO, but it looks so much closer to the Gen. I like the ceramic PO, but shouldn't the seconds hand have an orange tip? Seems to have a few more flaws than the LMPO Rep version of the same?
![]()
Why does everyone say the LMPO is a better rep than the CrPo? All the pics I've seen, the CrPo V2 looks much more accurate. I've noticed the LMPOs have issues with date wheel font, crooked markers, etc.
Why does everyone say the LMPO is a better rep than the CrPo? All the pics I've seen, the CrPo V2 looks much more accurate. I've noticed the LMPOs have issues with date wheel font, crooked markers, etc.
CrPO has major issues with fading bezel, which is a huge problem. The watch is not worth more than 200$