{*PCTeam*}[[ EVALUATION]]**PAM 164 N -Noob-H maker comparison [[CLOSED Poll]]

[ALE7575]

This thread is started to make:

Comparison between PAM 164 N-series from Noob Factiry and form H maker

And decide what is the best in the opinion of forum members.

It is advisable to participate and vote in this thread after to have make the Evaluation of both replica in the threads:

http://forum.replica-watch.info/vb/showthread.php/pcteam-evaluation-thread-116713

http://forum.replica-watch.info/vb/showthread.php/pcteam-evaluation-thread-116714


PLEASE POST THE REASONS OF YOUR DECISSION

Thanks for your kind cooperation

 

[thran]

The deciding factor for my vote and for my purchase was the lume & dial. After seeing discussion and pictures of both N and H and noticing that the H seemed to have a better dial in general compared to the N in my eyes. When i received the watch the CG was much better then i anticipated, it seems like they have really bumped the quality, waiting on my noob 111 v3 to compare to the 164 regarding the cg

Pictures to follow

 

[kaniel]

I voted Noob maker .

I thing the 164N Noob is better than the H factory in everything but the lume.

CG and lever are better by far on the Noob. The fonts on the dial are better on the Noob too. Bold letters and numbers same as gen.
H maker font are slightly thinner than the noob.

The H factory lume is superb but, apart from that, the noob is way better in every single aspect.


About the crystal and cyclops... I just can't judge from the pics. I doesn't own any of them and for the pics is so difficult to see how is the AR and the cyclops on the crystal...

Just my 2 cents.

 

[kaniel]

T When i received the watch the CG was much better then i anticipated, it seems like they have really bumped the quality,

H maker should inform if they have upgraded the cg... But for the pics of the dealers the cg doesn't look good IMHO.

 

[Bonesey]

Seems like the one thing they need to work on is getting that new CG rolled out to all models. In saying that, who on earth is going to notice something as small as slightly rounded cg corners in the real world. Both are super reps IMHO.

 

[MarkTS]

noobfacory pam164 better detail engraving and dial detail.

 

[Ander7]

I voted Noob maker .

I thing the 164N Noob is better than the H factory in everything but the lume.

I second that.

To add on, the Noobs font/Number color is not correct. A Gen one is slighty grayish/silverish. If they can apply the correct color like the H-maker, this will become a Super Rep. I wonder why it is so difficult for them to use the right color.

 

[Mr. Pap]

I think noob factory cannot be beaten in pams...

 

[PANERA]

Noob is no 1

 

[thran]

I dont know, i am looking at my Pam 164 H and i am amazed how good it looks especially the CG, My pam 111 N v3 is literally on its way as soon as i get it, i want to take pictures of the CG of both to show everyone.

 

[ALE7575]

Many thanks friends for your votes

to people voting here:
PLEASE VOTE TOO IN THE POLLS:

FOR NOOB FACTORY
http://forum.replica-watch.info/vb/showthread.php/pcteam-evaluation-thread-116713?t=116713

AND FOR H MAKER EVALUATION
http://forum.replica-watch.info/vb/showthread.php/pcteam-evaluation-thread-116714?t=116714

PLEASE VOTE IN TWO POLLS
Thanks

ALE

 

[thran]

Here is a quick comparison between the cg of a Noob 111 V3 and a H 164.

What do you guys think?

 

[ALE7575]

Thanks thran
This is an interesting comparison
And it is not really very important the difference.
It is evident in the inner edges... but at the real size....
ALE

 

[thran]

Thanks thran
This is an interesting comparison
And it is not really very important the difference.
ALE

I apologize, i thought the consensus is that the Noob CG is far more superior , it seems to me that the pin aligns very well, the lever has a snappy feeling exactly like the noob, there isnt really a gap compared to the other ones and the crown looks cut really well.

Let me take more pictures of just the Pam 164, especially when i get my macro lens

 

[ALE7575]

I apologize, i thought the consensus is that the Noob CG is far more superior , it seems to me that the pin aligns very well, the lever has a snappy feeling exactly like the noob, there isnt really a gap compared to the other ones and the crown looks cut really well.

Let me take more pictures of just the Pam 164, especially when i get my macro lens

No, no worries we need to know the real thing

It is obvious a big difference in inner edges of the CG.
But the matter is, This is really important ??.
For many people it is evident that it is important.
Therefore, we must accept the opinion of most of the people.

Anyway, perhaps there are more differences in finish and construction. we will see more pics about this subject

ALE

 

[mike 8]

@ALE
I enjoy this thread.
I was wondering if you have a similar thread
for the differences between the 104I
and 104N ?
If not I would be interested in hearing your views...

 

[ALE7575]

@ALE
I enjoy this thread.
I was wondering if you have a similar thread
for the differences between the 104I
and 104N ?
If not I would be interested in hearing your views...

LOL ... mike you are reading my thoughts
This PAM 104 will be most likely the next Evaluation !!!
Thanks for reading and participate my friend

ALE

 

[thran]

Here are some more pics of a Pam 164 H, I apologize still waiting on my macro lens to come back home so these are cell phone pics

 

[ALE7575]

Thanks thran for the pics
I hope more people will be encouraged to vote it !!

ALE

 

[wat44]

I have the original version before this current crop.

Are you interested in me photographing any particular details for comparison?