-
Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!
Panerai 571 -***** [ QC pics allowed ]*****
- Thread starter PAM1983
- Start date
Ok so here they are... Pam571 KW
The Date color on the numbers seems to be a bit tan to me... maybe it is a light trick or something. The second black marker starting from the 15 looks like it has blemishes... All in all It seems really well made to me. Your Thoughts?
Side Note: I already approved shipment before I realized the date number color seemed off to me. But for education purposes here you go gents.
The Date color on the numbers seems to be a bit tan to me... maybe it is a light trick or something. The second black marker starting from the 15 looks like it has blemishes... All in all It seems really well made to me. Your Thoughts?
Side Note: I already approved shipment before I realized the date number color seemed off to me. But for education purposes here you go gents.
From an Anal person's (me) opinion, the date number color seems off and the minute marker on the bezel is blemished...that would bother me. On the other hand, it's rep and you get what you pay for. Enjoy it, I think you will...nice looking watch.
Im sure I can fix the blemish... the color on the date is a different story. I will post better pics when I get the watch hopefully by Mon or Tue next week. If it is way off I might sell here and order another. We will see. OR I may just say Fvk it and wear the hell out of it.
Looks ok to me, but I'm not as anal as some. Got a 569 on the way but would love to get the 571 or the 243 sometime too. I would have accepted this on as the next might have even more flaws.
- 18/1/11
- 19,845
- 419
- 83
This watch seems awesome. I'm impressed by the overall quality
Date and inscriptions in modern PAMS are usually a bit brownish in comparison to the lume. This is a continous controversial matter. It seems OK for me (and NICE)
Bezel knurling, although not competely accurate (as always), is the best I have seen in a Titanium Sub. I like it
Pearl and bezel dots and markers are very good
15 seems a bit blemish, maybe just a dirty. If it is a lack of paint I think it is nothing you cannot fix easily
I would like to see more detailed pics of CP. But it seems OK
I would accept it
Since it has closed caseback we will have , most likely, another Sub Super rep at the level of PAM 364 or 243
ALE
Date and inscriptions in modern PAMS are usually a bit brownish in comparison to the lume. This is a continous controversial matter. It seems OK for me (and NICE)
Bezel knurling, although not competely accurate (as always), is the best I have seen in a Titanium Sub. I like it
Pearl and bezel dots and markers are very good
15 seems a bit blemish, maybe just a dirty. If it is a lack of paint I think it is nothing you cannot fix easily
I would like to see more detailed pics of CP. But it seems OK
I would accept it
Since it has closed caseback we will have , most likely, another Sub Super rep at the level of PAM 364 or 243
ALE
- 18/1/11
- 19,845
- 419
- 83
I know "30" on the bezel is turned a bit, but I don't care since this unit has great performance of movement:
ALE I am going to take better pics of watch when I get them and re-post them here. My TD photos are never of any amazing quality but they do the job. Thanks for your insight.
seagull - never again
i had 4 watches with seagulls - they all are dead or not autowindind.
I agree! I've had 5 seagulls, 3 stopped working or wouldn't auto wind. I've had 30+ A7750, only one had issues.
I think I got the Seagull movement... What are the reasons behind these Seagulls only working for a small amount of time? loose screws and pieces come off or move around?
