PAM508 ceramic sub V6F 23J or A7750

[Pauly404]

Hi guys,
I'm leaning toward the 23J as it's $100 less that the A7750.
What do you think? I can't find any reviews on the 23J auto....

 

[Pauly404]

Bigger pic

 

[nicktan182]

the 23J is just the seagull version offered by most TDs here. it's a very reliable piece, arguably more reliable than the 7750. just read Ale's guide and you'll get all
the info you need

 

[kilowattore]

Same as 7750 version in my sig, I have the same.movement in my 569 and.it's working.more.than.fine

 

[colorao01]

Many people prefer and it is more realible seagull , but I read many people have problems with Seagull and with 7750 is more easy change movement and look for pieces , I prefer 7750, but it's my opinion

 

[mysterio]

There is no difference in the watch itself, just the movement. Some like the A7750, some like the A23J (ST2555). It's a closed caseback so the more accurate look of the A23J is moot, but it's 100$ cheaper. So it's really your choice to make. Repair wise, both will necessitate removal of the decorative plates to make it look like a P9000 and then re-attaching them on the new movement (if you prefer). Reliability wise, the A7750 has a longer track record with reps, but all my ST2555 movement based reps have held up so far.

 

[Pauly404]

Great thanks. I'll go with the 23J. I have had a bad run with A7750 myself and $100 cheaper ...