PAM392- which rep.....?

[DB9506]

Am considering a 392 as my first step into the world of Panerai. A 42mm watch is required.

I've gone across the following reps and wondered what opinion was of each.

http://www.ttw8488.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=37_413&products_id=13049

http://puretime01.com/catalogsearch...:1+best+edition+on+black+leather+strap+p.9000

Thoughts on each? Veering towards the more expensive one from trusty time which I understand is a very recent release. Can anyone suggest which is the more accurate rep?


Thanks in advance.

 

[Debellum]

Hi Mate
I can't advice you about 42mm by Panerai.
For other reps :
111 - 177 - 176 - 005 - 127 like historical models.
346 - 390 - 372 - with manufacture caliber.
243 - 243J Tritium like Submersible.
This is my suggestion.
But there's many other super rep.
I can't help you with the Marina Automatic , 'cause I don't like it.
For my personal opinion Officine Panerai could be only manual winding. [emoji6]

Junio M.


[emoji41] Sent with my mental power [emoji41]

 

[ALE7575]

Both reps are the same and they are from first months 2015
They are very nicely made but the overall accuracy is far from the 44mm reps
If you need imperatively 44mm, they are good choices together with PAM 535

ALE

 

[buns7539]

I ordered a Pam 392 with the seagull st2555 movement. I got the QC pics and they look great. The TD put the watch on a timegrapher and it is 21800bph which I think is good but it is +14 seconds. What can be done? I was told that 30 seconds off either way is fine. I disagree. I think +/- 6 is acceptable.

Will that change after winding and using? Should I insist it be adjusted or a different watch?

Thanks


Sent from the RWI mobile app

 

[buns7539]

TD had the pam392 adjusted. The readings are now +7s/d, 295º, 0.6ms, 52.0º, 21600. Im not to happy with the 0.6ms. The readings before adjustment were: +14s/d, 318º, 0.1ms, 52.0º 21600. What do you guys think? Is this better or worse?

Thanks

 

[ALE7575]

TD had the pam392 adjusted. The readings are now +7s/d, 295º, 0.6ms, 52.0º, 21600. Im not to happy with the 0.6ms. The readings before adjustment were: +14s/d, 318º, 0.1ms, 52.0º 21600. What do you guys think? Is this better or worse?

Thanks

Obviously they are much better

ALE