PAM292N coming next month?

[shyreplover]

I read a posting on RG mentioning that Puretime is going to release PAM292N next month.
I thought (from what I read) that the M series is already super rep.
I wonder what else can be improved on the supposedly N series to make it even better?

...or is this just marketing ploy?

 

[ls_allmotor133]

I am also curious about this. Also, is the Silix version the 292M? http://www.silix-prime.co/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=115_152&products_id=3560

 

[ALE7575]

I read a posting on RG mentioning that Puretime is going to release PAM292N next month.
I thought (from what I read) that the M series is already super rep.
I wonder what else can be improved on the supposedly N series to make it even better?

...or is this just marketing ploy?

Firstly it is necessary to know if the info about a new N-series is correct.
Yes the PAM 292 full ceramic M series is a Super rep even the K-series with the case problem fixed would be a Super rep.
But a replica is not 100% perfect, therefore it is always possible an improvement
Maybe you improve something and ruin others, who knows ?
But in this way you will never buy a replica and less of Panerai with the continuous releasing of new versions. LOL
ALE

I am also curious about this. Also, is the Silix version the 292M? http://www.silix-prime.co/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=115_152&products_id=3560

The Silix watch is a K series because in the pics Silix has hidden the series with his web letters, but the millesimation is 1500 which corresponds to K series. The millesimation of M series is 1800.
Therefore K series for Silix model you are indicating

ALE

 

[co-axial]

The Silix watch is a K series because in the pics Silix has hidden the series with his web letters, but the millesimation is 1500 which corresponds to K series. The millesimation of M series is 1800.

True, well spotted ALE

@OP: If you read the RG thread correctly, you will notice that Angus is talking about "samples"

 

[shyreplover]

Firstly it is necessary to know if the info about a new N-series is correct.
Yes the PAM 292 full ceramic M series is a Super rep even the K-series with the case problem fixed would be a Super rep.
But a replica is not 100% perfect, therefore it is always possible an improvement
Maybe you improve something and ruin others, who knows ?
But in this way you will never buy a replica and less of Panerai with the continuous releasing of new versions. LOL
ALE

You are right that I need to decide at one point to just buy the damn thing.
It's just that PAM292 is revolving rather quickly compare to, say, Hublot V6... since has been the same since last year.

True, well spotted ALE

@OP: If you read the RG thread correctly, you will notice that Angus is talking about "samples"

I didn't read that "sample" part as I only read the last page. I'll read the RG thread again as a whole...