So far I can say:
- The cutouts of the sandwich are slightly wider, in the tradition of HWF.
- In general, the dial looks lighter, although, this is what is fashionable to say 100%, only in a parallel comparison, which may never happen.
- Case looks light. It is clear that sandblasted titanium looks lighter than DMLS, we saw this one on the example of PAM1662 VSF, and this one would be changed by choosing the correct intensity and particle size, but here I am even more confused by the question of whether the case is titanium. I really hope so.
- CG seems to be big, the movie is not proportionately large (although this is a common occurrence), the inner vertical sides of the CG notch are not rounded inward (This is something that a lot of work has been done with VSF). I don't see what's with the black stripe on the lever.
- The insert on the crown feels like rubber, as does the bezel, but it takes a personal touch to judge.
- The dome of the crystal will have to be compared carefully, but at first glance, it looks decent.
- The date font, as before, looks a little thin, but it’s clear, I haven’t seen a photo with the same date.
- Caseback engravings have differences in quality, but for me this is normal, in particular, I am glad to note that the case number is correct.
- To evaluate the case, photos at right angles will be required later, but I expect slightly smoothed edges, relative to gen, and a little more thickness.