• Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!

PAM1122 [TTF]

KOT1917

Respected Member
Section Moderator
26/7/19
3,389
5,501
113
Russian federation
zrssCY.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: JayBee0815

KOT1917

Respected Member
Section Moderator
26/7/19
3,389
5,501
113
Russian federation
TTF took on a very difficult, but interesting and important, in my opinion, work.

This is a special model in terms of the combination of parts and materials, and they have to make a domed sapphire, complex dial gradient, rubber bezel and crown case, make a titanium case and sandblast to ensure the coarse-grained DMLS effect of titanium.
More difficult, from the modern model range (if you do not take the complications of movt.), Probably only PAM1120 would be. Taking into account that TTF earlier treated rubberized crowns on models of the E-STEEL luminor 1950 line a little carelessly, I want to believe in the best, especially since PAM1120/1122/1124 have already been produced by low-class factories, in the appropriate quality.

I consider this a worthy challenge, and I hope for the best.
 

kilowattore

Sales Moderator / Section Moderator
Staff member
Moderator Sales
Section Moderator
Certified
11/5/13
13,955
6,394
113
Italy
Very interesting alternative to PAM 1662... fingers crossed
 

nicmend

Active Member
Certified
24/3/18
271
174
43
Interesting! I think it does look good except for the caseback which doesn't seem the best, especially the waves pattern.
 

KOT1917

Respected Member
Section Moderator
26/7/19
3,389
5,501
113
Russian federation
So far I can say:
- The cutouts of the sandwich are slightly wider, in the tradition of HWF.
- In general, the dial looks lighter, although, this is what is fashionable to say 100%, only in a parallel comparison, which may never happen.
- Case looks light. It is clear that sandblasted titanium looks lighter than DMLS, we saw this one on the example of PAM1662 VSF, and this one would be changed by choosing the correct intensity and particle size, but here I am even more confused by the question of whether the case is titanium. I really hope so.
- CG seems to be big, the movie is not proportionately large (although this is a common occurrence), the inner vertical sides of the CG notch are not rounded inward (This is something that a lot of work has been done with VSF). I don't see what's with the black stripe on the lever.
- The insert on the crown feels like rubber, as does the bezel, but it takes a personal touch to judge.
- The dome of the crystal will have to be compared carefully, but at first glance, it looks decent.
- The date font, as before, looks a little thin, but it’s clear, I haven’t seen a photo with the same date.
- Caseback engravings have differences in quality, but for me this is normal, in particular, I am glad to note that the case number is correct.
- To evaluate the case, photos at right angles will be required later, but I expect slightly smoothed edges, relative to gen, and a little more thickness.
 

Houstonanonymous8

Banned member, the goat does not approve
Banned
29/7/21
341
330
63
Def a different looking Panerai. Not sure about all the rubber accents though. Seems to feel cheap to me