Another view of the movement:
![]()
The pallet bridge is not brushed, the head of the micrometric screw is not drilled and I dont like the swan neck tail...
The finish of the bridges seems a bit rough... also the slots of the jewels are shallow imho.
I have the suspect that it's a very good franken...
Could be a movement with one or two china parts used but whole movement looks completely gen for me except for the pallet brushing that Bozz mentioned. However, i looked up google and h series doesnt seem to have the brushed pallet but i could be wrong. Have a look here http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=375628 . Serial engraving looks really shallow too, nearly laser etched. Caseback might have been over polished.
On a side note, funny how the old Pams' crown pin is protruding out instead of being recessed. It means Noob V3 is modelled after old Pams![]()
are you sure its gen? because the CG pin and CG is look way off to me...Could be a movement with one or two china parts used but whole movement looks completely gen for me except for the pallet brushing that Bozz mentioned. However, i looked up google and h series doesnt seem to have the brushed pallet but i could be wrong. Have a look here http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=375628 . Serial engraving looks really shallow too, nearly laser etched. Caseback might have been over polished.
On a side note, funny how the old Pams' crown pin is protruding out instead of being recessed. It means Noob V3 is modelled after old Pams![]()
are you sure its gen? because the CG pin and CG is look way off to me...
if its gen, then the QC is suck...
Another view:
Thanks for all your inputs and help! Much appreciated! I'm about to go "gen" and want to ensure I'm making the right choice (price being "gen" too)