Hey guys, I came across this H Fac PAM088 posted on pf-818, scroll to the bottom of the page and there are a ton of pics of a side-by-side comparison with a gen.
http://www.pf-818.com/0-pn088n01-pam-088n-gmt-ss-ru-black-a-7750-28800.html
With my newb eyes, my brief assessment is
Dial; overall not bad, picked out the following flaws;
1. The 24 hr numbers are too close to the edge of dial vs the gen.
2. The minute markers look a touch finer on the gen.
3. The point on the GMT hand is quite inaccurate imo.
CG & Crown
1. Crown looks ok and the thickness seems the same.
2. CG lever top is a lot smaller on the gen.
3. CG lever 'triangle' pressing the crown is not same shape.
4. Face on the CG shape looks spot on.
5. Side profile of the CG, the top right hand side above the screw (when lever is in open position) is very slightly thicker on the gen.
Case shape
1. Front on, they look identical.
2. From the side profile, I think the most obvious flaw is the lugs, the gen has sharper, longer lugs.
3. Case back looks ok, but hard to compare with each under different lights.
The lume looks spot on.
Even after pointing out those flaws, I still think this is a darn good rep.
Thoughts from the community?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
http://www.pf-818.com/0-pn088n01-pam-088n-gmt-ss-ru-black-a-7750-28800.html
With my newb eyes, my brief assessment is
Dial; overall not bad, picked out the following flaws;
1. The 24 hr numbers are too close to the edge of dial vs the gen.
2. The minute markers look a touch finer on the gen.
3. The point on the GMT hand is quite inaccurate imo.
CG & Crown
1. Crown looks ok and the thickness seems the same.
2. CG lever top is a lot smaller on the gen.
3. CG lever 'triangle' pressing the crown is not same shape.
4. Face on the CG shape looks spot on.
5. Side profile of the CG, the top right hand side above the screw (when lever is in open position) is very slightly thicker on the gen.
Case shape
1. Front on, they look identical.
2. From the side profile, I think the most obvious flaw is the lugs, the gen has sharper, longer lugs.
3. Case back looks ok, but hard to compare with each under different lights.
The lume looks spot on.
Even after pointing out those flaws, I still think this is a darn good rep.
Thoughts from the community?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk