PAM029 V2 QC Pictures - Feedback on possible issues?

[freddied]

Hi all,

Just received my QC pictures for my PAM029 V2 Noob from a well known TD. Everything looks great other than I feel that the date magnification window looks very off centre to the date, and it looks as though there is a slight chipping to the top of the paint in the number 6 on the bezel.

Does anyone have any thoughts? I appreciate no rep is perfect, but they look like fairly noticeable imperfections to me!

Quick feedback would be much appreciated!

Thanks in advance!

 

[rhp1462]

It is camera angle when talking about date mag.

 

[Mickey Padge]

It is camera angle when talking about date mag.

Could have an effect for sure, but that misalignment looks much worse than just the camera angle to me

 

[Z3BR4]

The mag window looks like its perfectly in line with the GMT 6 on the Bezel and 3 o'clock on the dial.. So I think it is just angle. It's a strange angle too.. The top of the image is closer than the bottom.

 

[davylloyd]

Why can't you apply some simple common sense?

If you can see more of the rehaut at the 6 o'clock position than you can at the 12, then clearly it is not square on.

Why don't people buy watches to enjoy them any more?

 

[Lunny]

Buy it!

 

[Mickey Padge]

I tried to duplicate the angle and pic using my own watch and was unable to do so, that's why I made the comment I did. Personally I would accept it, as I can easily re-align the crystal if needed, but not everyone can do that.....

Ask the dealer to take a front on straight shot, the eschewed angle of the QC pic's makes me suspicious

 

[ALE7575]

Time to close this thread
This in no the place to discuss things to be talked to your dealer

And, please, see the angle of the pic looking at other parts of the watch like the rehault...
ALE