Not enough resolution on your photo. Here's a bigger one with the same photo for the XF.
ZF
XF
From these pictures it does look like that ZF has a thinner caseback than the ZF. Also the ads state XF is 16.5mm thick while ZF is 15.5mm thick. It may only be 1mm thinner, but that's a 6% reduction in thickness.
Also the bezel on ZF looks more genlike. A bit wider than the XF.
ZF
XF
its a hugggggge improvement on the bezel!
looks like i have to sell my XF soon....
Sent from the RWI App
Don't do it.
XF looks much closer to GEN than ZF in compare dial width / bezel width ratio. (measured and calculated from available pictures)
can you explain a bit more about that?Don't do it.
XF looks much closer to GEN than ZF in compare dial width / bezel width ratio. (measured and calculated from available pictures)
can you explain a bit more about that?
I haven't seen nor handled the gen obviously (seems like only the internal team and some pr did) but I've handled my friend's xf rep and it looked somehow really odd and I couldn't pinpoint exactly where but I guess it was the bezel/dial proportion. If gen is like xf then it's an odd watch imho.
Sent from my SM-T325 using Tapatalk
Would it be because of 42 mm diameter? Most of us get used to 47 mm submersibles.some pics of gen (found on google) looks a bit odd too, maybe its the not-too-ordinary size
Sent from the RWI App
This would be personal preferences and impressions, I believe those are not such horrible :bigwink:.
There are two more points:
- CP on ZF looks to me too big, XF is closer to GEN
- However overall thickness of ZF case plays big role as well