• Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!

PAM 682; XF vs ZF

CharlieC

Do not accept unsolicited offers
26/7/17
10
0
1
Hello everyone, I’ve been really obsessed with the 682 for a while now. All the other 1950 style submersibles are just way to big for daily wear. I also just like a smaller watch. So while searching I found both the XF and ZF. I looked online and there was a decent amount of information about either watch, but only one thread comparing the two. I’d like to hear from you guys which one you think is closer to gen and which one has the least flaws, please be sure to state which flaws you see and also if you are an owner of either watch! Also a mini review wouldn’t hurt either! Thanks so much guys!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

joyjoyk

Known Member
10/3/18
135
60
28
Both are great. Just buy either. Not worth starting a review again since there's already information out there. The difference is negligible in the caseback when its on your wrist.
 

The Rod

I'm Pretty Popular
15/10/17
2,058
829
113
ZF is thinner and closer to gen thickness (15.5mm ZF vs 14.5mm Gen) whereas XF is thicker (16.5mm) but appears to have a better looking cannon pinion and bezel width closer to Gen. Honestly it's a toss up.
 
Last edited: