PAM 204 vs. PAM 520

[garbear99]

The PAM 520 is beautiful. I want it. My only issue is with the size. I am small and can barely pull off a 44 mm PAM. The 520, according to Josh's site is 45 mm. Josh has the PAM 204 in stock, which is a Radiomir chrono, but in 42 mm. I am torn. I like the 520 much better, but do not want to drop almost $400 if it does not fit. The 204 will fit, but it is not as sharp looking, at least in the photos. My question is if anyone knows the quality of the PAM 204. I chacked on Ale's review, but could not find the 204. Also, can anyone tell me how "big" the 520 wears. I have a 243, and I can pull it off. I also have an Arktos, but it is too big. Thanks.

 

[Evora]

All these Radiomir 1940 (PAM519/520/...) even if they are 45mm case, look/feel quite smaller than 44mm Luminor case or 45mm Radiomir. They are really thin.

If you decide to go with a 42mm Radiomir, PAM512, 336 are better option than PAM204 in term of accuracy (even if the movment is totaly wrong).

 

[galaxyhog]

i prefer my 520 to my 88 now.... and 520 is supposed to be larger

 

[winz]

45mm radiomir 1940 wear smaller than 44mm luminor (1950 or bettarini), because its don't have CG, imho