Note to Mr. Panerai

[nielsen]

Dear Mr. Panerai: I just received my rep of your 243 from the Noob factory, and it is absolutely stunning, and a remarkable copy of your watch--and it even keeps time. Thus for your next iteration, and because the rep factories are now so faithful in their latest copying of the genuine McCoy, please delete the !@#$%^&Y cyclops because they detracts from what is otherwise a brand of beautiful watches. The cyclops is unnecessary and adds visual clutter. Panerai shouldn't go there! Pay attention, Mr. Panerai, or we buyers of genuine replicas might desert you! :biglaugh:

Note to the Noob and "H" factory: Gentlemen, please hurry up and make a perfect clone of the Panerai in-house movement, and then plop it into an upgraded, 1:1, perfect, astonishingly realistic PAM 305. I'll buy. That's a promise! :maty:

 

[wat44]

I hate all cyclops - even submariners

Totally agree the Pam one is bad, especially the ring around it

 

[believer123]

I am not really fond of the cyclops either... That is why I mostly wear the PAM111 (no cyclops) or the Sub No-Date (no cyclops).

 

[FDG]

I am not really fond of the cyclops either... That is why I mostly wear the PAM111 (no cyclops) or the Sub No-Date (no cyclops).

And yet you have a cyclops watch as an avatar hihi

 

[BADWIN BING]

I love my 104, buy granted, the cyclops is shit.

 

[believer123]

And yet you have a cyclops watch as an avatar hihi

That's the only way I can get a YM... Plus, I did not say that I don't wear them, I just simply stated that I am not fond of them...