Posting qc pics asking for feedback is against the rules and is a bannable offense
Last edited by a moderator:
-
Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!
Noob pam 127 qc
- Thread starter darthvinh
- Start date
- Status
Wow, you aren't so bright. You aren't allowed to sell on here and now you post QC pics which are against the rules. I would log off and never come back if I were you.
I’m not selling anything, didn’t know QC pictures were not allowed.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- 25/8/13
- 15,414
- 4,258
- 113
Here's my feedback
You post is against our rules and I've edited it
This is a bannable offense
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
You post is against our rules and I've edited it
This is a bannable offense
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
- 25/8/13
- 15,414
- 4,258
- 113
The short answer is we dont allow them here because we make the rules. with a questions like what do you see wrong all it does it open a van of worms that isnt needed
QC pics are for the buyer to verify the watch being send it the watch ordered and that there are no glaring issues
They are not for others to start picking apart minor flaws that are spotted when viewed at 100x zoom ect
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
- 23/12/11
- 18,004
- 10,488
- 113
Here is an excellent example of why they are prohibited:
https://forum.replica-watch.info/fo...actory-bad-quality-control-qc-concerns-inside
- 25/8/13
- 15,414
- 4,258
- 113
- 23/12/11
- 18,004
- 10,488
- 113
I truly don’t know how some of these guys can even enjoy this hobby. I remember the pre-QC days when my watches arrived inside a stuffed animal and I prayed it was the correct watch. Then, it was 50-50 if it worked.
- 25/8/13
- 15,414
- 4,258
- 113
Nope now we must blow the QC pics up minimum of 40x throw it into photoshop or paint and start drawing lines across it looking for that 1 to be .0000001 mm lower
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
"We make the rules"? Jawohl herr kommandant, lol. The reason for my question was not borne out of some misguided promotion of the "pro QC photos camp", but simply to wonder why they were frowned upon. What's wrong with an occasional can of worms?
- 25/8/13
- 15,414
- 4,258
- 113
See link provided above by tucker
That's a good example of what qc pics can cause
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Jeez, this is what happens when I let little things like health issues get in the way of visiting the forum. Nothing is wrong with an occasional can of worms, that is, if you're a fish. :lol: For any other concerns regarding why things are the way they are, I suggest doing some reading.
I don't think the question was that important to drag you from your medical issues, but I'm flattered you thought it worthy. Again, I say, I don't have any concerns regarding "things are the way things are" although it does suggest some dictatorial overtures, still...... And yes, I like to read and was hoping to read a civil answer to a civil question from a noob perspective. Have I stumbled onto another forum overrun with mods that have overinflated opinions of their own self worth wielding big sticks adorned with spikes and knobly bits? I'm only here a few days, should I pack a toothbrush already?
- 23/12/11
- 18,004
- 10,488
- 113
It sure as hell is not a democracy. A few days? I bet you have been here longer than that.
Oh, I didn't come here for you, just to put your feeling of self-importance in place. I am here almost every day as this is my section. xj4s0nx was being nice (yes, he was). The long and short of it is, QC pictures are not allowed to be posted in RWI in general, but in some brand sections, we have some allowances. Post it in a PAM specific thread that is specifically marked by **QC pictures allowed** OR if you have a specific concern in which case you only post the picture where that said concern can be found. Don't post with "I got QC, someone check it if there are issues." it never gets attention and it will get shutdown. Members are expected to read up on their watch of choice and understand the limitations being that it is, at the end of the day, a watch made in China by poorly paid workers under no visible established quality control nor manufacturing tolerances and what not. What you may see as a problem might be an identified AND more importantly, accepted flaw or tell on that particular rep. The PAM127 is one of those certified super reps when it first came out a few years ago and the latest Noob one has been upgraded with the Y-incabloc movement so its classification is even more warranted. So any QC concern should be a glaring flaw and should have been posted with only that picture.
It's not dictatorial, it's merely, those are the rules here. When in Rome, do what the Romans do.
- Status