• Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!

New (thinner) Submersible coming? SIHH2017

Olavmol

Renowned Member
Supporter
Certified
14/8/11
930
826
93
Amsterdam
Just saw this in my mail.
New Submersible without the printed "Automatic".
Also has a thinner case and lugs.
Interesting to see how this will look as I like the chunkyness of the Subs.

What's your guess?
I know I can't wait till next week!

d729872c2e8c1f5deb68b5b273edd4cd.jpg



Sent from the RWI mobile app
 

rakman

Active Member
Supporter
Certified
11/7/15
237
28
28
Luminor Due was interesting for some people, they must be doing the same for the submersible also
 

nalomb

Be Excellent
6/8/12
3,563
627
113
I'm all for a slimmer submersible, but can it be repped?

May actually be easier -- the bezel ring is way too think on the Rep Due. This may compensate for it if they keep the rotating bezel the same thickness. Of course, I doubt they will haha.


Sent from the RWI mobile app
 

PAM1983

I'm Pretty Popular
6/4/15
1,174
9
0
My friend has a Gen 305. The 305 compared to the 571 Rep is much thinner in case and bezel. It's obvious on the wrist. Side by side was a no brained. I'd say they are thinner already compared to what we get with reps.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Olavmol

Renowned Member
Supporter
Certified
14/8/11
930
826
93
Amsterdam
Yes it is here!
Didn't even see it due to all that is being introduced.

The Pam1389
2224cc9e5480111f4ecbaccc16a8eb99.jpg

066672607d2d3af5edc7407b3dc97568.jpg

17a69847ec36a16a4a78cf89738d2cef.jpg


And the Pam1305
44a502ebe35c4dd0d82af2e6136109da.jpg

c51a83fc935552947b84e36b7a066602.jpg

753454c1f833293055b9100fda88794d.jpg

6308782cd9a3e6f497da771433e3c5dc.jpg


And then the new 42mm case

The Pam0682
c8d0cda045592d47fb91278da4fc18e5.jpg

f658b904caa67fa8dd7401adeb1d2dc1.jpg

baecd0e53a5cf4a70ac7863db3228f90.jpg

0a13e574ac9f7b38ca0d20fcf861270c.jpg

28aafec0247ec762613b5e98e4021784.jpg




Sent from the RWI mobile app
 

gsxcbr1

Renowned Member
Certified
8/8/11
591
8
18
I'm in love with the 42mm 682. I used to own the 44mm 243 diver and I loved it but it was just a little too big. This looks like the perfect size and I love the exhibition case back! I'll definitely be picking one of these up if it gets repped.
 

mysterio

Mythical Poster
Advisor
19/8/08
9,794
864
0
My friend has a Gen 305. The 305 compared to the 571 Rep is much thinner in case and bezel. It's obvious on the wrist. Side by side was a no brained. I'd say they are thinner already compared to what we get with reps.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

How much thinner is it?
 

SuperLory

Well-Known Repist
22/10/15
8,456
5,049
113
wow, 682. I'll better stick this in my mind cos I'll be needing it
 

mysterio

Mythical Poster
Advisor
19/8/08
9,794
864
0
anybody knows the lug to lug length of pam682?

Sent from the RWI mobile app

I have not seen an article on the PAMs that makes mention of the lug to lug width. Nor are there any comparisons to be made with existing reps as there has been no 42mm submersibles until now.

I am certain to get at least the Red Gold version as I want to have all manner of materials used in PAM Subs. :)