New p9000 clone movement released on pam359

[sweden]

http://puretime.watch/product/pam359-q-jf-11-best-edition-on-black-leather-strap-p9000-clone/

Couldn't find a thread about it, please close if so.

Really interesting with a movement with all new features

 

[jelly jam]

I'm guessing this is the same decorative P9000 plate covering the movement I've seen before. Could the movement be similar to a GMT type that allows the GMT hand to be moved in hour increments? It's very cool that the functions work like a real P9000.

 

[kilowattore]

I'm guessing this is the same decorative P9000 plate covering the movement I've seen before. Could the movement be similar to a GMT type that allows the GMT hand to be moved in hour increments? It's very cool that the functions work like a real P9000.

This is not a decorated a7750 as we're used to. It's the "cloned" P9000 movement that Angus was talking about. Many functions are similar to the gen P9000, but the layout is still totally different (see the balance wheel at 9) Anyway a very interesting movement.

 

[ceesq]

as the hand functions are same as gen its great for all closed caseback pams like 508 / 571 / 389 / etc

 

[Pamfanatic]

OMG.. Finally there is the changing of dates by the hour hand!!!!!!!! Hopefully this'll be implemented on the 389 and the other subs!!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[arizonaboy]

The fit and finish look really good as well.

 

[jelly jam]

When someone gets this, please post pictures and brief review. I may get one and will post but it could be weeks away.

 

[Apcheng]

Anyone took the plunge on this yet? Wondering if its worth upgrading from my KW version!

 

[mskwatch]

is it 12H GMT or 24H?

 

[PeterRei]

The second is not where it should be

 

[ALE7575]

is it 12H GMT or 24H?

???
This watch is not GMT

ALE

 

[Apcheng]

The second is not where it should be

You are right, I looked at mine and the seconds is more to the left and this version is more to the middle.

The numbers on the dial also appear to be less "smokey" or "dirty" and more greenish compared to the KW version.

Edit: not greenish but creamier

 

[kevin.123]

Seems like this movement will be a big game changer next year and would bring the pam back to its former fame?

Sent from my SM-N910G using Tapatalk

 

[ALE7575]

The second is not where it should be

Yo are right

Reason enough to DOWNGRADE this rep

Besides this issue is also for PAM 616 and 569 from SF

Very very good catch !!

ALE

 

[ALE7575]

The date window has also inaccurate placement it is clearly displaced to the center. This is a serious and obvious tell
The date fonts are completely inaccurate really bigger.
Rotor bearing cup is different form gen (really noticeable)
The Balance wheel hole is smaller and really inaccurate, in the same way as the first ZFac.
The placement of the Balance Wheel axle is also very close to the center
Placement of Balance wheel @9, diammetricaly opposite to the Crown is more noticeable than @6 (Seagull) and @11 (A7750) of previous decorated movements

Avobe mentioned flaws show that this movement is a decorated and modified unknown Asian movement. It is not at all a Clone.
Which could be the reason to make a Clone with all above mentioned differences?

With such a flaws and the inaccurate position of seconds hand axle, this movement cannot be considered as a good alternative for P.9000 reps


ALE

 

[ALE7575]

The date window has also inaccurate placement it is clearly displaced to the center. This is a serious and obvious tell
The date fonts are completely inaccurate really bigger.
Rotor bearing cup is different form gen (really noticeable)
The Balance wheel hole is smaller and really inaccurate, in the same way as the first ZFac.
The placement of the Balance Wheel axle is also very close to the center
Placement of Balance wheel @9, diammetricaly opposite to the Crown is more noticeable than @6 (Seagull) and @11 (A7750) of previous decorated movements

Avobe mentioned flaws show that this movement is a decorated and modified unknown Asian movement. It is not at all a Clone.
Which could be the reason to make a Clone with all above mentioned differences?

With such a flaws and the inaccurate position of seconds hand axle, this movement cannot be considered as a good alternative for P.9000 reps


ALE