New to the boards, you guys have built a fantastic community from what I've seen while researching!
Lots of questions, my research only seems to lead to more variables.
I'm leaning toward a 1950 flyback (love the complications and the 1950 material in general) or something with the date (for practical reasons) like a 312. Which leads to the first question.
What's the difference between a 312 and 320 for example? I don't see anything about the 320 that makes it GMT.
For a flyback I was looking at this specifically (hope the direct link is Ok): http://www.trusty-watch.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=37_56&products_id=7219
So, my second set of concerns arises when comparing to the pamguide...the notes say that the 212 and 213 have false flyback and rattrapante movements. The 213 in the link above has a CG whereas the pamguide shows a 213 without, is either accurate? I was under the impression that a flyback is technically a different complication than a rattrapante, no? Would these features work on the replica I posted the link to? Lastly, when aiming for visual accuracy, or movements for that matter, I am lost when it comes to the coding being used. With things like "RU", "SS/RU", "SS/LE" how do I determine what that means to match it to my needs?
Thank you in advance, sorry for the novel!
Lots of questions, my research only seems to lead to more variables.
I'm leaning toward a 1950 flyback (love the complications and the 1950 material in general) or something with the date (for practical reasons) like a 312. Which leads to the first question.
What's the difference between a 312 and 320 for example? I don't see anything about the 320 that makes it GMT.
For a flyback I was looking at this specifically (hope the direct link is Ok): http://www.trusty-watch.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=37_56&products_id=7219
So, my second set of concerns arises when comparing to the pamguide...the notes say that the 212 and 213 have false flyback and rattrapante movements. The 213 in the link above has a CG whereas the pamguide shows a 213 without, is either accurate? I was under the impression that a flyback is technically a different complication than a rattrapante, no? Would these features work on the replica I posted the link to? Lastly, when aiming for visual accuracy, or movements for that matter, I am lost when it comes to the coding being used. With things like "RU", "SS/RU", "SS/LE" how do I determine what that means to match it to my needs?
Thank you in advance, sorry for the novel!