I have not been on the Forum too long, but I have been around long before joining, so let's be somewhat fair. It's a good, if not a very good visual copy, based on the images, and as a production model. That is not saying anything about how it actually appears in hand next or next to a gen , as in the images. Obviously there are flaws, but actually, where it counts, I think it passes well as a replication. Of course, if you deal with genuine watches each day, and deal with IWC, from a few feet away, I am sure it passes with a quick glance. But in hand, to someone familiar, well, time for Dr. Frankenstein & $$$ to get to work.
I may buy this watch, since I love IWC's and have a few in my collection. If I do, I will take it into a shop that sells this exact model watch. I will weave this story that I received it as a Christmas gift from a client, and want to verify that its real. Tell them I just don't trust my client, bla, bla, bla.... So I can compare both, the gen to my rep, in complete amazement that I am the victim of a client playing with me to reduce their fee. I would hope they would "help" me to identify the flaws with the rep, No better person to evaluate it than a pissed retailer.
:lolcina: Maybe I am being too forgiving to the AF version. It may be because I can barely make my own signature match exactly if I sign it twice, and Ive been doing that for a hell of a long time. :lolcina: