I'm seeing a few noticeable differences:
1) The gen date is centered perfectly, while the rep date not as well.
2) The depth and width of vertical incisions in the crown are far greater in the gen than in the rep.
3) The shape of the bezel teeth are more irregular on the rep.
4) The lume is FAR more blurry on the rep (compare, for example, the marker at 6 o'clock), while the gen lume edges are crisp.
5) The serial numbers are less defined on the rep (notice the "8" on the rep, for example).
6) The print block "Pelagos, etc." above 6 o'clock isn't as crisply rendered (note the second pic, for example).
To summarize my estimation, although the watch is beautiful and will ABSOLUTELY withstand casual observation (like, who in the world is going to take a loupe and examine it the way we do in this forum?), this watch definitely does NOT qualify as a super-rep.