![DSC02460-Copy.jpg](http://i684.photobucket.com/albums/vv204/ea82_82/DSC02460-Copy.jpg)
![DSC02464.jpg](http://i684.photobucket.com/albums/vv204/ea82_82/DSC02464.jpg)
My gen POC. I've had it for about 6 months.Just wanted to illustrate some of the reps more obvious tells. I do not have the rep but have seen pics. First is the sub dial spacing on the autos, but i know this is kinda fixed on th quartz versions. But there are still other tells.
for example: the case of the gen chrono is thicker, and has a polished lip on the bottom of both sides that adds to the thickness, my gen pic shows it. The rep looks like it uses the same thinner case as the non chrono PO.
![DSC02445-Copy.jpg](http://i684.photobucket.com/albums/vv204/ea82_82/DSC02445-Copy.jpg)
and here:
![DSC02446-Copy.jpg](http://i684.photobucket.com/albums/vv204/ea82_82/DSC02446-Copy.jpg)
the next obvious flaw is the pearl, the gen has it centered on the triangle not too low, my UPO is really nice, but has this flaw as well, an easy tell.
![DSC02451-Copy.jpg](http://i684.photobucket.com/albums/vv204/ea82_82/DSC02451-Copy.jpg)
Next obvious flaw is the date wheel and numerals. the gen's are really crisp and thin.
![DSC02450-Copy.jpg](http://i684.photobucket.com/albums/vv204/ea82_82/DSC02450-Copy.jpg)
and who can forget the world/omega symbol on the back.
![DSC02456-Copy.jpg](http://i684.photobucket.com/albums/vv204/ea82_82/DSC02456-Copy.jpg)
There you go, hope these pics help. I've seen a lot of non chrono comparison pics, but the gen chrono version pics are hard to come by. The rep is OK from what I've seen in pics, but too many flaws. The UPO on the other hand is pretty accurate. So, I have a few more pics if there is any interest in them.
![DSC02458-Copy.jpg](http://i684.photobucket.com/albums/vv204/ea82_82/DSC02458-Copy.jpg)