babola said:
my intention was far from influencing other people in making their PAM rep purchasing decision (well, not to a great extent, anyway)
Anyway, 183 and 210 are Radiomir dials, made for diferent case size, and definitelly and dissimilar to 111/112/177 simply because er...they're diferent
. Luminor Marina and Base 44mm dials come with some minor diferences, 111H and 177H share the same dial for example, gen or rep, 112 as you know comes without second subdial, but sports a nice number '9' on a dial.
Yes, all of the H series rep dials have wrong number '6' compared to gen's (the tip is slightly off) but that doesn't mean they're bad at all. The H series dial cutouts copy G series painted/sausage dials numbers, which Panerai slightly changed on their H series.
127 and 217 rep dials are excellent IMO. Great attention to details and excellent reproduction, it makes you wonder sometimes why the gen 217 dial would cost over $1k doesn't it
I just assumed that the shape of the cut outs on 183 & 210 dials were the same as the 177/111/112. So are you saying they are indeed different? Are the 210 & 183 dials pretty accurate in your opinion ?
Babola, Im just busting your balls a bit :lol:
A lot of people have influenced my decisions... but to a certain extent, I let them! I take my time reading as much as I can. The problem is, the more I read, the more flaws people point out. Its my fault. I could of just ordered a watch, but I choose to keep reading and asking questions.
I think it works out better for me this way, as I would rather read, and read, and read then make my decision, then to order the watch, only to get annoyed by certain things and ending up never wearing it or selling it (most likely at a loss).
A perfect example is the IWC Ingie. I've been dying for it. But I keep reading posts about the damn date wheel and how the hands are a "glaring flaw" becasue they are 1/100000 of a inch too short.
Part of the issue I think, is that when you visit places like this form or one of the dealers websites and you see a pic of a watch, it is blown up by atleast 10x. The more I really think about it, will one really be able to tell that the hands or date wheel of a certain watch is off? Or with the Radiomir, that the case is ever so slightly fatter at the corners and doesn't taper as much as the gen?
When a 44mm watch is blow up to 14", flaws are not only very easy to see, but it makes me very hesitant to order a watch. In reality though, the only way you'll be able to see most flaws is to be a few inches away from the watch. And to quote someone on RWG (I think it was RWG) "if someone is so close that they can see those flaws, I better be sleeping with them!"
As with you, I think I am a victim of my own passion. Even with gen watches I own, I get obsessed with little "flaws." Flaws I am sure that no one can see but me.
This pic was stolen from one of the Paneristi boards. Dial looks good to me. Print color may be a bit off (white vs off-white), but font looks good. Cut out numerals look spot on in my eye. What flaws are there?
Im glad to know that everyone consideres the 217 and 127 dials perfect. Now if I can just figure out which case is the better one (0581 vs 0117) and if its really 1:1 I'd love to pull the trigger on and buy myself a b-day present!