M+ Mark18 and MKS Mark18

[krausephil]

Left is M+; right is MKS.

Besides the M+ crystal is no blue reflection at all, M+ details are more accurate, the ceramic is more in black and matches the newer production of IWC, and the crown is the correct matt finishing

IMG 5332

Image IMG 5332 hosted in ClickPix.org

clickpix.org

IMG 5334

Image IMG 5334 hosted in ClickPix.org

clickpix.org

IMG 5335

Image IMG 5335 hosted in ClickPix.org

clickpix.org

 

[nardius]

Have you noticed the crystal blueness in daily wear?

 

[krausephil]

no, M+ is totally clean like plastic acrylic no matter outdoor or indoor, that's the cons.

 

[pippo]

Is it me ofr the lugs on the MKF are thinner ?
The colorless AR is a plus for me, regardless of accuracy to gen.

 

[optical]

Looks like MKS has stainless steel crown, the crown and caseback should be titanium in these models.

 

[krausephil]

Is it me ofr the lugs on the MKF are thinner ?
The colorless AR is a plus for me, regardless of accuracy to gen.

yes MKF is thinner

 

[Teetertank]

These have very differnt shaped bezels too. Haven't compared to gen but one must be closer.