Is this true????

[E J]

http://www.ttwristwatch.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=37_61&products_id=585

"This is the BEST movement ever made which is 98% close to the genuine"

So what is that 2%?

Thanks guys

 

[Niko]

I can't comment on how good this movement is, as I have never tested one, but as they say, if it was 100% accurate, then it would be gen!

 

[jb]

This is the same movement that Ziggy reviewed. There are actually some major flaws.

"http://www.rwg.cc/members/Movement-Review-New-6497-1-With-Some-Problems-t12765.html"

Tootall brought this to the attention of the BWB a while back. We have discussed it and will be posting some information soon. This has been delayed due to the facet that the member that was supposed to write it fell seriously ill and has not yet returned. I have taken over the project, but have not had the time to put it together.

 

[horologie_unitas]

straight up........thats



100% BULLSHIT

 

[OiRogers]

98% VISUALLY perhaps...
It is a nice looking movement though...

Bet you a dollar (RWI bux) that movements of this type will be standard issue in the nicer pam reps within a year or so.

 

[astig]

weve seen nicer engravings but without the dagger type SN.

 

[JOEJOEJOE]

http://replica-watch.info/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24486

Check out the link above. It's my 176G with the same movement.

Visually it looks quite nice - definitely not 100% accurate though

So far it's been running well - over a year now.