Can any conaisseur put in their 2 cents regarding this new release? http://www.p-cls.com/pn504o01-504o-composite-dlcle-brown-p3000-p-14716.html
Also any idea which fac is it coming from?
Also any idea which fac is it coming from?
-
Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!
How about that Pam 504 on perfect clones site?
- Thread starter Simced
- Start date
Can't believe it's getting absolutely ZERO hype. Is there something I'm missing here? Looks sick.
I was wondering about the same. They are new age movements and very good quality in general, low interest. Why?
Almost same as 505 just bigger size, no dw and deco movt. I think factory should start listening what the market wants like the fiddy and 243m v2. Maybe if this is the 508 with close caseback might draw better attention cause of the lack of supply of the 243m v2.
I love the 508 but I've been told no way is that coming. I bought the 504... love the big size and no DW. Ill post pics when I get it.
For me, not being ceramic or somekind of "Composit" but a dlc SS is a deal breaker for me. The 292 spoiled me.
+1 , had both the 505 and the 292J , it was a easy decision which to keep ..loving the 292 ...so light on the wrist !
Not a fan as 47mm with so little on the face would overwhelm my delicate and lady-like 7" wrists lol, but definitely agree that a 'fantasy' 505 or 386 would look fab with gold hands.
- 18/1/11
- 19,846
- 423
- 83
This is a fantastic watch and a very good replica, maybe another First Class replica bordering Super rep status from KW
No Super due to non clone movement but just decorated. I'm actually considering to change my order of PAM 505 to PAM 504.
I don't like that the decorated movement is the same as Puretime version, non nice fitting of bridges and blue screws.
I think people are confusing PAM 505 and 504. But size, non date and mainly gold hands make the difference !
ALE
No Super due to non clone movement but just decorated. I'm actually considering to change my order of PAM 505 to PAM 504.
I don't like that the decorated movement is the same as Puretime version, non nice fitting of bridges and blue screws.
I think people are confusing PAM 505 and 504. But size, non date and mainly gold hands make the difference !
ALE
FWIW - Josh told me he thinks the KW decoration bridges are much better than either of the 372s. I was surprised to hear (read) this from him.
Indeed the no date and gold hands sets this watch apart by far (IMO) from the 505, but the DLC, that's the deal breaker for me! I really want a Pam with gold on it, wether its the hands or the case!
Like the 336 for example, lets all get together a push for a gold Radiomir super rep, not bad idea eh?
Ale what do you think? Is it too much to ask for? Perhaps not enough demand?
Like the 336 for example, lets all get together a push for a gold Radiomir super rep, not bad idea eh?
Ale what do you think? Is it too much to ask for? Perhaps not enough demand?
- 18/1/11
- 19,846
- 423
- 83
I don't understand many things about this matter.
- KW decoration is clear the same as Puretime
- We know that from Blue screws to the fitting of bridges H maker is clearly superior.
- Puretime has already corrected the blue screws. Why is KW using an "old" Puretime decoration?
- More weird, Why is KW using a PT decoration, mainly being H maker superior?
- And, as above said, why is Joshua saying an evident and great falsehood ?
Are there here some commercial agreements ??
Just my thoughts
ALE
- 18/1/11
- 19,846
- 423
- 83
42mm...Rose gold case...Display movement with a complicated to be replicated movement P.999
...Not really the most demanded
ALE
I guess I was asking for a little to much with the 336, but is there any gold Pam that would be reasonable to replicate?