• Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!

H-fact PAM113 Pictorial

vootzilla

Active Member
26/3/08
203
0
0
The white-faced pams are always my fav (well,...look at my avatar) and I was really excited when H fact came out with 113/114 models a month ago. I wanted to wait for the Noob to bring out some battle but they are so silent so I couldn't resist anymore... H-fact 113 it is...

I haven't seen many threads about newly released 113/114 so I decided to take some shots and hope it helps ppl in making decision about them.

Nothing to say much regarding the case construction, sapphire, etc etc.. coz it should be the same set as other handwound H-fact PAMs. The focus of this should be on the "dial". We all knew by heart that there is no rep white-faced dials coming close to gen at all. I think that's still the fact. This H-fact 113 dial almost made it but it still lacks the enamel-like surface finishing. The dial is glossy but not so enamel like. The indices are raised and super glossy which is quite accurate as per gen. The lume dots are great, very white in daylight and glow bright in the dark as expected but they could be more refined since there appear some lume texture in the dark. The subdial has concentric circles but even in my own hand, I still can't figure out if it's recessed or not. It looks like the concentric circles are stamped above the dial to create the subdial. If anyone have this, please confirm. I'm really not sure since I don't have a loupe.

That's all the observations I saw with it in my hands. This is not a review, only a pictorial thread so you can see more clearly what to expect. I'm not good at macro at all and without a tripod, these are the best I can do.


IMG_0007_zps89eede0d.jpg


IMG_0014_zps1d02ea38.jpg


IMG_0005_zps00314153.jpg


IMG_0009_zps63de847d.jpg


IMG_0015_zpsf907fdb9.jpg


IMG_0012_zpsa5f69347.jpg


IMG_0017_zps42fcaa96.jpg


IMG_0008_zps84b279ad.jpg
 

co-axial

Legendary Member
Advisor
16/9/10
23,225
10
0
Due to the subdual being bad the 114 is the way to go imho. Basic and better.
Thanks for the pics though :wave:
 

hado67

I'm Pretty Popular
4/7/11
1,748
2
38
Nice pics! I still havent made my mind up , 113 or 114?
 

vootzilla

Active Member
26/3/08
203
0
0
if the subdial bugs you (it doesn't bug me at all), go for 114. DSN dial suffers from the shrinking effect meaning that all the numbers are too far from the rehaut. It looks like the whole dial is shrunk to me. But form what i saw the latter versions are better in that area.
 

vootzilla

Active Member
26/3/08
203
0
0
I'm not sure which version is used as his base watch/dial. I think this H-fact dial version came closest to date (not including DSN 1st version which can't be sourced today anymore).
 

thereefster

Known Member
10/8/13
103
0
0
I'm not sure which version is used as his base watch/dial. I think this H-fact dial version came closest to date (not including DSN 1st version which can't be sourced today anymore).

i think he's using the recessed sub dial