• Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!

GMT weight difference GEN vs REP

johnlogan

Mythical Poster
Supporter
Certified
18/12/15
9,576
11,938
113

Root beer is GEN. Fairly large difference in weight. Tudor gold is only “wrapped” that yield no added weight.
 

muiramas

Erect Aristocrat
18/1/17
5,730
7,101
113
The .58 has a tungsten rotor. Not sure if the larger movement Tudor use has as well.
 

Storm.

Mythical Poster
Supporter
Certified
14/2/20
7,062
9,851
113
Well, the website states all links GMT steel weighs 183 grams.

So yea.
 

DougDoug

You're Saying I Can Sell?
5/5/21
30
13
8
Perhaps a little off topic but isn’t the incorrect hand stack more obvious than weight differences?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jammydodger79

GrandmasterChime

Agent Provocateur
Supporter
Certified
6/1/19
1,732
1,339
113
New Zealand

Root beer is GEN. Fairly large difference in weight. Tudor gold is only “wrapped” that yield no added weight.
Not true.. actual wrapping like Tudor do will add weight and the bezel on the root beer is solid gold. There's your difference

Sent from my SM-G998B using Tapatalk
 

RJay

Horology Curious
26/4/22
11
3
3
NA
To sum it up, likely a Tungsten rotor, gold bezel, and gold capped bracelet links. 316L steel cubic density is 8g/cc, 18k gold is around 16g/cc/, and tungsten is just over 19g/cc.

The rotor is probably ~0.4cc, so a tungsten one would increase the weight by ~4.5g
The bracelet has 15-16 links that are gold capped. Gold caps are usually ~200 microns (0.2mm) thick. Each link is around 2cm of area, which is around 0.64cc altogether, so the gold capped bracelet adds another ~5g
The bezel is probably another ~0.5cc, so a gold bezel would add another ~4g

Altogether 13.5g increase. Not too shabby.
 
Last edited: