GMT IIC GEN vs REP

[MEYER8888]

when i toke a look on my old pictures i saw what i toke fast the same pictures of my GEN gmt and my rep GMT, let s you see somes pictures to make you a better idea of this rep model, as you can see the bigger flaw is the AR, but we can say it s a nice done no?
REP

GEN

REP

GEN

REP

GEN

REP

GEN

REP

GEN

 

[SMIDSY]

sideby side time!!

 

[MEYER8888]

i saled the rep long time anymore, doesn t have it sorry

 

[SMIDSY]

oh oh well

 

[co-axial]

Thank you very much Meyer.

Just compared the gen pics to my GMT II in hands, and yes it´s the AR!
But I personally can live with it; also ´cause ARed cyclops and AR under cyclops cost more than the watch; my wife would then definitively want to kill me on an instant...:facepalm:

 

[MEYER8888]

if some members have interest i can o the same with my new gen sub and the rep one

 

[shandroid]

cool post - these are great value!

 

[SMIDSY]

if some members have interest i can o the same with my new gen sub and the rep one

yes please :d

 

[MEYER8888]

will make it!
for the gmt II the cyclops and canon pin are really the flaws
but as you can see the steel color is a little bit different too, more grey on rep.
when you wear it i find the gen with more presence, and really better resistance to scratches

 

[shandroid]

i look forward to your new comparo!

 

[MEYER8888]

ok thanks

 

[alvinado]

yep we need the comparo!