Gen Pam with engraving error? Lol

[wooky492]

Apparently, some of the Pams with extra 'E' on engraving "stainless steeel" wasn't an error after all.

This is a gen (399 i think) purchased at Las Vegas AD. This guy later received the correct one with an letter of apology but still very amusing.

See how much our Chinese manufacturers pay attention to every little details? They are 1:1 for sure! Lol

 

[silverclaw]

And with the 399 as well... Wow! I wonder how many out of 50 got the error, LOL.

that could have been a collector version of a collectors item :O

 

[Watchman215]

Wow dumb on the owners part to request a new watch. I would have snapped all of them up and put them in the safe.

 

[ALE7575]

Thanks for remember it
I knew this mistake from another thread here or in RepGeek

Big mistake to change the wrong caseback
Do you imagine the price of these wrong watches??

ALE

 

[silverclaw]

But the price of these 399s though! We need a super rep. Now. ALE, make it happen!!!

 

[ALE7575]

I will try it

LOL

ALE

 

[wooky492]

Apparently the owner was 'smart' enough to keep the errorneous caseback and put the new caseback for insurance . Like Ale said, he is betting on the value going up for this 'unique' one off piece :-D

 

[mysterio]

But the price of these 399s though! We need a super rep. Now. ALE, make it happen!!!

So ALE, you're a maker now? :lol:

 

[ALE7575]

So ALE, you're a maker now? :lol:

It's almost the only thing I lack to do ... LOL..

ALE