-
Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!
gen or rep?
- Thread starter Pannyforme
- Start date
- 2/12/08
- 311
- 85
- 0
No way to tell with these satellite images you have provided. 
Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk 2
Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk 2
yeah sorry guys, the fella has a history with reps and keep posting on gen groups. and this is the only photo that i could save off it..what are the tells?
Gap between case and crown showing the hex tube. The gen is much narrower and you see less of the tube. Got my Noob on my wrist as I type, and it's identical. Viewing on an iPhone, so I can get close in on the photo. Bet he didn't post a photo of the back The strap on it looks like a Kingnob one from eBay too.
The strap on it looks like a Kingnob one from eBay too.
- 18/1/11
- 19,846
- 423
- 83
With the current level of the PAM reps it is almost impossible to tell a rep with such bad defined pics
The PAM 250 is more easy to tell because they are many things to tell the rep. The PAM177 is more difficult
PAM 250 is surely a rep because the date window seems closer to the center than gen, then would be a rep before 2013. Most likely a Noob 2010. But the pic has few definition to say it definitely. With a better pic the identification would be immediate with maker and year of production
PAM177 has some details of rep, like the flaw above said and the shape of roller support in CG. We would need better detailed pics to tell the rep definitely. Crown shape, lever shape, crystal bevelled, lug shape, lug contours, and mainly movement... With these details we would be able to say even the maker
ALE
The PAM 250 is more easy to tell because they are many things to tell the rep. The PAM177 is more difficult
PAM 250 is surely a rep because the date window seems closer to the center than gen, then would be a rep before 2013. Most likely a Noob 2010. But the pic has few definition to say it definitely. With a better pic the identification would be immediate with maker and year of production
PAM177 has some details of rep, like the flaw above said and the shape of roller support in CG. We would need better detailed pics to tell the rep definitely. Crown shape, lever shape, crystal bevelled, lug shape, lug contours, and mainly movement... With these details we would be able to say even the maker
ALE
Not until I finish losing weight
Congrats man! Hopefully mine will start getting baggy after new years!
Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk 2