- 3/8/15
- 1,281
- 1,182
- 113
Stumbled upon an interesting topic on gen forum lately.
It seems that after Panerai Movement Scandal where they put totally basic non decorated 6497 movements in their limited edition 318 New York Luminors a few years ago:
Effectively making gen watches come with shittier movements than reps
And after recent Perezcope „In-House Movement Scandal” where it rurned out that Panerai did not inform anyone that their In-House is actually a modified ETA hidden under obscured see-through caseback.
Now it looks like our rep DLC/PVD PAMs are better at holding their coating together, just look at what happens to gen 360s:
Way over normal use patina. Looks like surface was not prepared properly for coating and it just slowly dissapears.
Crazy!
It seems that after Panerai Movement Scandal where they put totally basic non decorated 6497 movements in their limited edition 318 New York Luminors a few years ago:
Effectively making gen watches come with shittier movements than reps
And after recent Perezcope „In-House Movement Scandal” where it rurned out that Panerai did not inform anyone that their In-House is actually a modified ETA hidden under obscured see-through caseback.
Now it looks like our rep DLC/PVD PAMs are better at holding their coating together, just look at what happens to gen 360s:
Way over normal use patina. Looks like surface was not prepared properly for coating and it just slowly dissapears.
Crazy!