(...)
Look at that :
http://www.ige.ch/e/jurinfo/j10801.shtm
For industry products, 60% of the manufacturing costs must occur in Switzerland
I suppose a standard watch movement is far from representing a big percentage in a gen, so there's absolutely no objection of it being 100% made in China (or elsewhere)
This is if you consider the whole watch. No problem to have a Seagull caliber in a genuine Swiss made watch.
Considering the movement alone : with the same logics, as long as there is an operation/part that represent 60% of the cost, then it's "made in Switzerland", according to the a.m. statement. Find the most expensive part in a movement, manufacture it in Switzerland, send it to China, have the rest done and assembled there, then you might end in really believing that a "genuine" ETA movement can be mainly made in China.
An other tought : maybe a "simple" servicing and adjusting done at the end in Switzerland is enough : look at what you're asked for this as an aftermarket operation :roll:
If so, the ETA group can only blame those who took the decision to have parts made abroad, whereas horology is one of the national pride for Swiss people (at least I suppose).
But, this also means that something make the Swiss ETA and its Asian counterpart different...somewhere, and whatever it is.
[quote:2yhq8jso]4. What applies for watches?
The use of the designation "Made in Switzerland" is regulated for watches under the ‘Swiss-made Ordinance for Watches’. The Federation of the Swiss Watch Industry (FH) presented the Federal Council with a proposal to toughen this ordinance in the summer of 2007. The «Swissness» amendments, however, already propose differentiated rules for all product categories, including watches. In addition, the amendment drafted by the FH was problematical in relation to the supplementary watch agreement between Switzerland and the European Economic Community from 1972. The Federal Council, therefore, expressed the opinion in its response to the Berberat Interpellation of 4 October 2007 (in German) that the watch industry should use the time needed for the revision of the legislative foundation to reexamine its strategy. This would allow it to present the Federal Council with a revised draft as soon as the new legislative basis is clear.