• Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!

Datejust Date Wheel Overlay

Nur-Uhr

Time Machine
Patron
Certified
20/2/17
3,958
7,264
113
EU
Take one from Rafflesdials .... much better and more accurate.

What 16200 build (5-digit) are you planning?
From which "year" should the build look like?
 
  • Like
Reactions: pompompurin

ark7ik

Getting To Know The Place
20/9/23
23
6
3

Take one from Rafflesdials .... much better and more accurate.

What 16200 build (5-digit) are you planning?
From which "year" should the build look like?
I’m actually buying the rest of the stuff from raffles, not sure what year my build is based on but it’s Raffles’s stuff issue is his DWO doesn’t fit on a 2824 only 2836 but his case is for a 2824 so I don’t think it will fit
 

Nur-Uhr

Time Machine
Patron
Certified
20/2/17
3,958
7,264
113
EU
Shoot him an Email (raffles) normally he has a matching DWO.
He has not all products listed online.
 

KJ2020

Time Traveler
Supporter
12/3/18
35,337
69,616
113
I’m actually buying the rest of the stuff from raffles, not sure what year my build is based on but it’s Raffles’s stuff issue is his DWO doesn’t fit on a 2824 only 2836 but his case is for a 2824 so I don’t think it will fit
The DWO you linked is mediocre - No serifs and too bold. Fonts are not crisp - look at 2, 28, 29

Generally speaking a DWO that fits on a 2836 will fit on a 2824. The ID and OD of the DWO would be the same and the number positions identical. Unless ofc you are talking about a DJ41, which I assume is not the case here.

For a 2824, thickness becomes an issue but DWOs are typically the same thickness regardless of what movement they are for. The 2824 has extremely little room to add a DWO - the vertical clearance below is tight due to the minute train bridge screw and arm, and the vertical clearance above is tight due to the proximity of the backside of the dial.

There is usually some tweaking that needs to be done to make the fit work like lightly sanding the minute train bridge screw to a shorter height, adding some spacers like a couple layers of narrow bracelet tape on top of the dial spacer, adding a spacer under the DWO, etc. But the tweaking can be done with any DWO or even a 3135 DW after sanding away its teeth.

The Raffles 3135 DW has the best fonts I have found on any aftermarket DW - just last night I sanded down the teeth and glued it onto a 2824 DW. The fonts are better than the Raffles ETA DWO, which will also work on either a 2824 or a 2836. The ETA DWO should be good enough, it's just not as great as the 3135 DW.

Raffles 3135 DW - look at those number definitions!

H6kfAv.jpeg


H6kuVL.jpeg


H6kG7j.jpeg


Slide a slightly bulky roundish object behind the sandpaper for back pressure. I used a plastic tweezers which have a tapered thickness, perfect to increase the paper diameter as the teeth recede.

Use a finer grit paper as you get closer to finishing.
H6kF81.jpeg


H6kbYI.jpeg


Some metal particles can get under the tape but they are easily cleaned away with Rodico.
H6k0z4.jpeg


Note the double thickness DW blank plate and the tall minute train bridge screw
H9mdao.jpeg


Note the double layer bracelet tape strips on the dial spacer and the sanded minute train bridge screw
H64ZoQ.jpeg
 
Last edited:

Nur-Uhr

Time Machine
Patron
Certified
20/2/17
3,958
7,264
113
EU
@KJ2020 amazing detailed explanation and pictured tutorial as always !! :D :D :D

@ark7ik - with this post from KJ2020 - you have detailed information to this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KJ2020

ark7ik

Getting To Know The Place
20/9/23
23
6
3
The DWO you linked is mediocre - No serifs and too bold. Fonts are not crisp - look at 2, 28, 29

Generally speaking a DWO that fits on a 2836 will fit on a 2824. The ID and OD of the DWO would be the same and the number positions identical. Unless ofc you are talking about a DJ41, which I assume is not the case here.

For a 2824, thickness becomes an issue but DWOs are typically the same thickness regardless of what movement they are for. The 2824 has extremely little room to add a DWO - the vertical clearance below is tight due to the minute train bridge screw and arm, and the vertical clearance above is tight due to the proximity of the backside of the dial.

There is usually some tweaking that needs to be done to make the fit work like lightly sanding the minute train bridge screw to a shorter height, adding some spacers like a couple layers of narrow bracelet tape on top of the dial spacer, adding a spacer under the DWO, etc. But the tweaking can be done with any DWO or even a 3135 DW after sanding away its teeth.

The Raffles 3135 DW has the best fonts I have found on any aftermarket DW - just last night I sanded down the teeth and glued it onto a 2824 DW. The fonts are better than the Raffles ETA DWO, which will also work on either a 2824 or a 2836. The ETA DWO should be good enough, it's just not as great as the 3135 DW.

Raffles 3135 DW - look at those number definitions!

H6kfAv.jpeg


H6kuVL.jpeg


H6kG7j.jpeg


Slide a slightly bulky roundish object behind the sandpaper for back pressure. I used a plastic tweezers which have a tapered thickness, perfect to increase the paper diameter as the teeth recede.

Use a finer grit paper as you get closer to finishing.
H6kF81.jpeg


H6kbYI.jpeg


Some metal particles can get under the tape but they are easily cleaned away with Rodico.
H6k0z4.jpeg


Note the double thickness DW blank plate and the tall minute train bridge screw
H9mdao.jpeg


Note the double layer bracelet tape strips on the dial spacer and the sanded minute train bridge screw
H64ZoQ.jpeg
Thank you very very much!
 
  • Like
Reactions: KJ2020

KJ2020

Time Traveler
Supporter
12/3/18
35,337
69,616
113
One more question if you don’t mind @KJ2020

Which of these is the correct DWO for a 36mm datejust (12600) with 2824 movement?

1: https://rafflesdials.com/one-pc-whi...s-rolex-3135-datejust-or-3155-day-date-watch/

2: https://rafflesdials.com/one-pc-whi...r-day-date-or-submariner-or-gmt-master-watch/
If you search for pics of that model you don't see any open 6 / 9 date fonts, so the better choice would be #1 IMO.


 
Last edited: