Yes, date font is wrong type and very small.
Anyway, it is an excellent replica. I doubt 1 in a thousand would have a clue it is a rep but you know, nothing is absolutely perfect, so there are always small flaws.
Crown lateral screws are a little too big and those placed at quadrants should be flat, not curved head.
Domed glass is a little more curved in original, so AR is impressive. Not sure if rep has AR.
All hands should be shiny polished silver ( ALL) and not darked, and subdials are a little smaller in the real thing.
Chrono pushers are a little shorter in authentic (maybe half a milimeter
)
Pearl is too flat in rep, as its ring holder. Original has a more spheric shape.
Case back engraved letters are too thick in rep, and central circle where logo is place should be also polished and shiny....
But if you like this style, i wouldn't hesitate in taking it... in my opinion it is one of the best reps out there, and personally i don't think this one will take much better.