- 8/11/17
- 293
- 90
- 28
Hi all,
As I was lucky to acquire Gen Cartier Tank Solo large, I would like to compare Gen vs. Rep from AF.
This is based on a personal opinion who doesn't have eagle eyes. Please refers to the attached pictures for more details.
Gen is with a white sticker, Rep is with a green sticker.
1. Dial (9.5/10)
- Gen has a slightly warmer white tone and very little more embossed dial printing, but it can't be called out even side by side comparison.
- Definitely hard to tell on the wrist.
2. Casing (8.5/10)
- Gen has smoother hairline polishings on the top and bottom, but Rep represented pretty well. Sizewise looks pretty equal.
- The glass sits even nicer on the Rep watch.
3. Hands (9.7/10)
- Can't tell the difference. Blue hands are very well replicated.
4. Crown (8/10)
- The shape of the crown is different, but no one will look for the 1mm of difference on your wrist.
5. Gem (9/10)
- Looks very similar (only it looks darker on the picture). Feels slightly pointy on Rep.
6. Caseback (9/10)
- The font looks the same, but Gen has a deeper and shinier engraving
Overall : (9.5/10)
- Well, if you are into easy-going, slim watches, this is the one. The Quartz movement will not make any trouble
.
- I will keep my gen watch but it is very hard to tell the difference. Definitely NWBIG for me!
As I was lucky to acquire Gen Cartier Tank Solo large, I would like to compare Gen vs. Rep from AF.
This is based on a personal opinion who doesn't have eagle eyes. Please refers to the attached pictures for more details.
Gen is with a white sticker, Rep is with a green sticker.
1. Dial (9.5/10)
- Gen has a slightly warmer white tone and very little more embossed dial printing, but it can't be called out even side by side comparison.
- Definitely hard to tell on the wrist.
2. Casing (8.5/10)
- Gen has smoother hairline polishings on the top and bottom, but Rep represented pretty well. Sizewise looks pretty equal.
- The glass sits even nicer on the Rep watch.
3. Hands (9.7/10)
- Can't tell the difference. Blue hands are very well replicated.
4. Crown (8/10)
- The shape of the crown is different, but no one will look for the 1mm of difference on your wrist.
5. Gem (9/10)
- Looks very similar (only it looks darker on the picture). Feels slightly pointy on Rep.
6. Caseback (9/10)
- The font looks the same, but Gen has a deeper and shinier engraving
Overall : (9.5/10)
- Well, if you are into easy-going, slim watches, this is the one. The Quartz movement will not make any trouble
.
- I will keep my gen watch but it is very hard to tell the difference. Definitely NWBIG for me!
Last edited: