BPF Sub 16610vs ARF Sub 16610

[michael0703]

Anyone out there able to give a comparison of the two. The ARF is approximately twice the price as the BPF. Is it worth the price difference other than the 904 stainless steel?

Any advise appreciated as I am about to order one or the other.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[meatbao]

hi buddy. not sure if you've read through the rolex forums, but personally I'd go for the ARF version. There's a reason for the difference in price apart from the metal used.

Ultimately it depends on the comfort of your wallet, as well as your tolerance level on it's "flaws". its a non-gen watch afterall. the higher the price you pay, the lesser it's flaws as compared to a gen piece.

 

[michael0703]

I placed my order with Andrew at TrustyTime. I went with the ARF 16610 LN. QC pics have been approved and awaiting shipment.

Cant wait to get my first rep!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk