- 27/12/10
- 416
- 1
- 18
Have a look:
http://www.chrono24.com/de/rolex/submariner-116610lv--id2060247.htm?picnum=0&tab=pics
I really can't make my mind over this watch:
* Hour hand looks definitely wrong!
* I'm pretty sure Rolex never made a blue faced STEEL SubC, only made from white gold.
* Can't make out the bracelet, whether middle links are polished (correct for white gold SubC 116619LB) or brushed (correct for 116610 steel SubC)
* Then again: Case seems to be correct size, horns are chunky, CG are short and stubby like gen
* Also bezel inlay looks def gen to me
* Cyclops - I dunno. Doesn't look AR'ed to me, but could be the angle?
* Rehaut engravings "ROLEXROLEX" line up correctly, even @9 o'clock, when you look closely...
This whole watch makes no sense to me?!
Where are the Rolex experts, here...?!? ))
Cheers,
this
http://www.chrono24.com/de/rolex/submariner-116610lv--id2060247.htm?picnum=0&tab=pics
I really can't make my mind over this watch:
* Hour hand looks definitely wrong!
* I'm pretty sure Rolex never made a blue faced STEEL SubC, only made from white gold.
* Can't make out the bracelet, whether middle links are polished (correct for white gold SubC 116619LB) or brushed (correct for 116610 steel SubC)
* Then again: Case seems to be correct size, horns are chunky, CG are short and stubby like gen
* Also bezel inlay looks def gen to me
* Cyclops - I dunno. Doesn't look AR'ed to me, but could be the angle?
* Rehaut engravings "ROLEXROLEX" line up correctly, even @9 o'clock, when you look closely...
This whole watch makes no sense to me?!
Where are the Rolex experts, here...?!? ))
Cheers,
this