hxxp://cgi.ebay.com/Authentic-Omega-Spe ... dZViewItem tsk tsk tsk
D drfcfighter I'm Pretty Popular 19/11/06 1,307 2 38 29/8/07 #1 hxxp://cgi.ebay.com/Authentic-Omega-Spe ... dZViewItem tsk tsk tsk
D drfcfighter I'm Pretty Popular 19/11/06 1,307 2 38 29/8/07 #4 I'm pretty sure... look at the dial spacing; gen is crowded withb all equal lume markers, whereas rep markers are shorter at 3 & 9 o'clocks. Anyone correct me if I'm wrong.
I'm pretty sure... look at the dial spacing; gen is crowded withb all equal lume markers, whereas rep markers are shorter at 3 & 9 o'clocks. Anyone correct me if I'm wrong.
D drfcfighter I'm Pretty Popular 19/11/06 1,307 2 38 29/8/07 #5 Nevermind... didn't know it was the 3510.50 reduced version Learn a new thing everyday :lol:
V Vric Renowned Member 17/6/06 857 208 43 29/8/07 #6 Sorry, but this is a gen one.. Reduced, subdial spacing is correct on this version. Second at 3. Great watch
Sorry, but this is a gen one.. Reduced, subdial spacing is correct on this version. Second at 3. Great watch
B b16a2 Active Member 13/1/07 418 0 0 29/8/07 #7 It's a gen, this version used a different movement, so the subdials are actually spaced further out to the outside of the dial.
It's a gen, this version used a different movement, so the subdials are actually spaced further out to the outside of the dial.
H horologie_unitas Put Some Respect On My Name 3/12/06 5,148 3 0 30/8/07 #9 i was wondering also....look at all the watches this guy sells......gen. no doubt.