Hellcat said:
What does that mean exactly? The site can monitor where the link is referred from? curious.......
This is how the web works.
Here's the last line in my webserver logs. Note the image was linked to from RWI:
Code:
70.nnn.nn.190 - - [18/Feb/2007:15:18:40 +0000] "GET /posts/wristshot/20070208.jpg HTTP/1.1" 200 146338 "http://replica-watch.info/forum/viewtopic.php?t=16934&start=30" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; InfoPath.1)"
Looks like someone is looking at the wristcheck post.
Here's an unusual one:
Code:
81.n.nnn.207 - - [18/Feb/2007:15:17:34 +0000] "GET /posts/rolex/tog-01.jpg HTTP/1.1" 200 146006 "http://www.rwg.cc/members/index.php?showtopic=10043" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; es-ES; rv:1.8.1.1) Gecko/20061204 Firefox/2.0.0.1"
That's the
"My Collection" post on RWG.
Here's someone that found my homepage from an article linked on Digg:
Code:
76.nnn.n.152 - - [17/Feb/2007:01:54:24 +0000] "GET /link/3467/xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx HTTP/1.1" 200 14950 "http://www.digg.com/movies/xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.1) Gecko/20061204 Firefox/2.0.0.1"
That one shows that someone on Digg saw a link to my page and clicked onto it.
This is the exact method Paypal used to shut down PT and Reg's Paypal accounts.
(please note, the logs have been obfuscated slightly for anonymity reasons)