- 25/10/18
- 510
- 356
- 63
Some of you may have already seen the masterful build of my gen/Rolex matte dial 16800 by Trip here:
https://forum.replica-watch.info/for...763635-bods-tc
I love the watch, but as anyone who has built a 16800 knows, there are issues with these builds since there are no factory reps. When I had Trip build it, he did a superb job with the parts at hand, lowering the rehaut on my TC watch to be more gen-like, installing an ETA movement, and using a DWO with open 6/9s (there are no good repro overlays to be had). It looks wonderful, but after it was built, I had the chance to acquire a serviced 3035 movement at a reasonable price, so did.
I simply love the matte dial 16800s, and decided I wanted to have the watch made into a genstein, with the original parts, using the original
palletone/matte dial, 3035 Rolex movement, 3035 Tritium hands, Rolex bezel assembly, Rolex 3035 open 6/9 DW, and a Phong case with a customized S/N consistent with a 1982 watch.
And yes, I know about WMA (or whatever they were) cases, and ST 3035 cases, and finding those now are like finding a unicorn. So my
choice for a 3035 case really came down to Phong, (or maybe MQ)
I have been out of town since 1/2, so just opened the package from Phong today. He did not send me any photos of it other than one photo just prior to mailing it to me. In retrospect, perhaps I should have asked for photos, but I had heard good things about how accurate his cases were so did not. He is also a man of few words, and I suppose I was a bit intimidated.
Photos are below. A couple of things stand out - the caseback has the Rolex logo, which I think did not appear until the 168000 and 16610 lines - and after 1982. In addition, the lug hole on one of the lugs looks a bit ill-placed and close to the chamfer, and it is not well-placed vs. the one on the other side - it looks as though any springbar placed between them would be tilted. Truthfully, I'm surprised at how bad it looks. As far as crown guards, I am not a great judge of those, so am anxious to hear your thoughts.
Please help - we all know that at $1300, Phong cases are not cheap by any means, and this is going to be a special watch. For the price, and for what I had heard about Phong from well-placed people on this forum, his cases were the best to get. I can always ask JonJ to reshape the watch if that is needed, but I want the caseback to reflect the correct age of the watch, and the lugholes on one side bug me - and those things can't be changed.
I'm looking for some expert builders' honest comments here - am I being too picky? If you were in my shoes, would you just accept this case and get on with things?
Has anyone ever dealt with Phong before? Would it be totally unreasonable for me to return the case and ask for one without the Rolex logo and for better-placed lug holes all around?
Thanks in advance for any thoughtful comments/suggestions!
The last photo is the best image of the two mis-matched lug holes, one very close to the chamfer edge.
https://forum.replica-watch.info/for...763635-bods-tc
I love the watch, but as anyone who has built a 16800 knows, there are issues with these builds since there are no factory reps. When I had Trip build it, he did a superb job with the parts at hand, lowering the rehaut on my TC watch to be more gen-like, installing an ETA movement, and using a DWO with open 6/9s (there are no good repro overlays to be had). It looks wonderful, but after it was built, I had the chance to acquire a serviced 3035 movement at a reasonable price, so did.
I simply love the matte dial 16800s, and decided I wanted to have the watch made into a genstein, with the original parts, using the original
palletone/matte dial, 3035 Rolex movement, 3035 Tritium hands, Rolex bezel assembly, Rolex 3035 open 6/9 DW, and a Phong case with a customized S/N consistent with a 1982 watch.
And yes, I know about WMA (or whatever they were) cases, and ST 3035 cases, and finding those now are like finding a unicorn. So my
choice for a 3035 case really came down to Phong, (or maybe MQ)
I have been out of town since 1/2, so just opened the package from Phong today. He did not send me any photos of it other than one photo just prior to mailing it to me. In retrospect, perhaps I should have asked for photos, but I had heard good things about how accurate his cases were so did not. He is also a man of few words, and I suppose I was a bit intimidated.
Photos are below. A couple of things stand out - the caseback has the Rolex logo, which I think did not appear until the 168000 and 16610 lines - and after 1982. In addition, the lug hole on one of the lugs looks a bit ill-placed and close to the chamfer, and it is not well-placed vs. the one on the other side - it looks as though any springbar placed between them would be tilted. Truthfully, I'm surprised at how bad it looks. As far as crown guards, I am not a great judge of those, so am anxious to hear your thoughts.
Please help - we all know that at $1300, Phong cases are not cheap by any means, and this is going to be a special watch. For the price, and for what I had heard about Phong from well-placed people on this forum, his cases were the best to get. I can always ask JonJ to reshape the watch if that is needed, but I want the caseback to reflect the correct age of the watch, and the lugholes on one side bug me - and those things can't be changed.
I'm looking for some expert builders' honest comments here - am I being too picky? If you were in my shoes, would you just accept this case and get on with things?
Has anyone ever dealt with Phong before? Would it be totally unreasonable for me to return the case and ask for one without the Rolex logo and for better-placed lug holes all around?
Thanks in advance for any thoughtful comments/suggestions!
The last photo is the best image of the two mis-matched lug holes, one very close to the chamfer edge.







Last edited: