Hi Guys,
I'm waiting on a PAM111 and have just received a timeographer result (which weirdly wasn't provided with the origninal QC Pics, I had to request that they send Timeographer results) and whilst everything else seems acceptable, the daily rate is at +13s/day. This seems pretty bad for a brand new a6497, right?
For reference these are the results:
Rate: +13s/day
Amp: 274
Beat Error: 0.2
Lift Angle: 52 Degrees
I believe the lift angle of 52 degrees is incorrect for the 6497, but if it was done at the correct angle (I believe it's 44 degrees) would this likely result in a better daily rate or worse?
The only other rep I've had with an a6497 was a really low end IWC rep, years ago, and on the wrist this was about +1-2/s day, which kind of of blew my mind. Do you think I'm being unreasonable in requesting another watch if this one is performing at +13/s?
I know in the scheme of things +13/s isn't that bad but this is generally pretty bad for a new 6497, right?
I'm waiting on a PAM111 and have just received a timeographer result (which weirdly wasn't provided with the origninal QC Pics, I had to request that they send Timeographer results) and whilst everything else seems acceptable, the daily rate is at +13s/day. This seems pretty bad for a brand new a6497, right?
For reference these are the results:
Rate: +13s/day
Amp: 274
Beat Error: 0.2
Lift Angle: 52 Degrees
I believe the lift angle of 52 degrees is incorrect for the 6497, but if it was done at the correct angle (I believe it's 44 degrees) would this likely result in a better daily rate or worse?
The only other rep I've had with an a6497 was a really low end IWC rep, years ago, and on the wrist this was about +1-2/s day, which kind of of blew my mind. Do you think I'm being unreasonable in requesting another watch if this one is performing at +13/s?
I know in the scheme of things +13/s isn't that bad but this is generally pretty bad for a new 6497, right?
Last edited: