• Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!

A Comprehensive Info on the VS4131 (aka DD4131)

trustytime

Trusted Dealer
Trusted Dealer
3/4/16
2,306
2,105
113
VSF has provided a comprehensive information on the VS4131 movement found on their Daytona 1265xx, based on their knowledge and development of the VS4131.

The write up is translated, but the general information that VSF is trying to inform can be understood.


The VS4131 Daytona Movement - More Stable, More Exquisite



People are asking why the SH4131 movement is already so widely sold by many factories, and the VS4131 movement is so late to the market?



That is because the development paths of the SH4131 and VS4131 are very different. The VS4131 is directly developed based on the gen's 4131 movement. With a more rationale design and better stability, 95% of VS4131 parts can be interchanged with the genuine movement. The SH4131 movement is based on the 4130 movement made based on 7750 technology, and then modified from the SH4130. Only the exterior of the movement looks similar, but many of the internal parts of the movement are pieced together by technology from low-end movements. Not to mention the so-called parts that can be interchanged with the gen movement, some of which are exaggerated. You can look at the disassembly and comparison of the SH4131 and the gen movement from earlier reviews. In fact, the workmanship and completion of the SH4131 movement are about the same level as the "blue hairspring" 3135 movement in 2018, and it is still unrefined.



1. Front Finishing details:



When playing with replicas, everyone wants to buy a similar, good, and stable one. However, the replica 4131 movement in the market so far, based on the SH4131 movement, the workmanship and finishing appearance is similar to the stainless steel basin/table used at home, shallow and unclear. Even from different angles, the texture is low-end.

Rolex models are mostly closed caseback, and the workmanship and appearance of the movement are usually invisible to everyone. However, the difference in the level of movement finishing essentially tells you about the difference in the quality of the movement factory's equipment and technicians' workmanship. If a factory cannot handle a simple finishing appearance, will such a factory be able to produce a high-precision and stable quality movement? It can't be, just like the many China domestic cars, if the car companies can't even make the car frame well, it is also unlikely to have a good domestically made engine. This measurement of standard not only measures the difference in standard but also the quality of the products.



2. Back Finishing Details:



You can see clearly from the above details, that the VS4131 clearly has the finishing like the original, while the SH4131 currently in the market has unrefined workmanship. Don't underestimate this difference. In the world of a watch movement, a slight difference in precision can lead to a huge difference in quality.



Some people may wonder if the SH4131 was photographed so dark and rough. To clear this up, look at the other comparison pictures of other details below, and you will find that it is actually quite rough. Compare it with the genuine 4131 and the back of the the SH4131 movement. You will be surprised! Right? It's so rough!

The SH4131 movement is not as consistent as what was advertised previously in reviews, and the finishing are so unrefined and rough.



3. Shock Absorber Comparison:



VS4131 and the genuine 4131 movement both uses real shock absorbers, with the same appearance and structure and real functionality. The SH4131 movement is equipped with a fake shock absorber decoration, hiding an Asia low-end movement shock absorber. A fake free sprung balance, completely different from the genuine movement. More importantly, the stability and resistance to drops and knocks of the movement is much worse than the genuine or VS4131.


4. Is There a Shock Absorber?:



After removing the automatic rotor winding module, you can see the secondary part of the movement. Here, the "clever"/cutting corners of the SH4131 movement are performed again! Again! Again! Again, using an ordinary ruby to replace where the shock absorber should have been. Use gemstones to replace shock absorbers because customers/you can't see it either.

The reason why the stability of these high-end Rolex movements is so awesome is that there are many amazing design details, such as using shock absorbers in key positions to avoid quality problems such as breakage. VSF invested in the new VS3135 movement and installed the same shock absorber as the original.

While the 3135 movement on the market is only equipped with an ordinary gem, and the appearance is completely different from the original. The stability and drop resistance of the movement will be much worse than the original and VSF.



5. Details of the Gem Hole:


From the details of the gem hole, we once again look at the "cleverness"/cutting corners of this commonly used SH4131 movement. Areas that are visible are made better, but cut corners at the hidden areas.



The genuine 4131 movement, the gem hole at this position has two upper and lower rubies to secure the transmission shaft, and the gem hole of the VS4131 movement is also secured with two rubies.

The SH4131 movement has only the one visible ruby, which causes the transmission shaft to shake a lot, and cause quality problems such as unstable movement. The winding will feel light, but the gears will be easily damaged, resulting in quality problems such as failure to wind.



6. Escapement Details Comparison:




In fact, many parts of SH4131 are not developed according to the genuine movement, but from the 7750 movement. For example, the details of escapement structure. Both the VS customized 4131 movement and the genuine 4131 movement are based on Rolex's unique herringbone escapement. The SH4131 movement still uses the T-shaped escapement used by Asia movements such as 7750. There are also many different parts, such as the limit structure under the balance wheel, in the shape of a horseshoe is also different.



This small part is installed under the balance wheel, and it has a nickname, called horseshoe. The horseshoe shape of VS4131 movement and genuine 4131 movement is the same, and the function is the same. The gourd-shaped belly limits the escape wheel. The SH4131 movement is different from the genuine one, and the function is not good. Two small pins need to be added to have the limit function.



7. Limit Structure Comparison:



VS4131 movement and genuine 4131 movement, there isn't two extra small pins under the balance wheel. SH4131 has two more pins under the balance wheel, and the structure is different from the genuine one. The function of these two pillars is to limit the horse wheel, which is a design from the 1980s and 1990s. Now high-end movements have long stopped using this design, but low-end movements are still using this design. Interested friends can take a look at the two antique movements below.



8. Timing After Disassembly and Assembly:



VS4131 movement, after disassembly and reassembly, the amplitude can reach 300, and the rate can be regulated, and the timing is perfect. The genuine 3135 movement, after disassembly and reassembly, does not need any adjustment, and the timing data is still very good. Very awesome.

The SH4131 movement, after being disassembled and reassembled, proves that Asia movements, especially low-end ones, cannot withstand the curse of disassembly and assembly. After disassembly and assembly, the swing amplitude cannot go up, hovering around 200. After disassembly and assembly, it is already half-disabled. This is also the reason why many Asia movements of average quality cannot be repaired, repeatedly repaired, or become more and more disabled after quality problems. (The machining precision of movement parts is not high enough, and the fit between parts is not perfect enough)



SH4131 is limited by the manufacturing equipment and technology of the movement factory, as well as the "clever"/cutting corners attitude in the details of internal structure and accessories, which is results in its unstable quality, many problems and return rate. The dyke of a thousand miles, destroyed by ant's den. Not changing the quality of the movement, but only repeatedly screen those movements with good timing data. This practice of individual factories is a bit of a cover-up. It can only ensure that the timing data looks good when shipped. After the customer receives it, whether it is stable or not depends on the customer's character.



9. Movement Disassembly:



Finally, here is a movement disassembly photo that everyone likes. It is important to choose the right version.

 
Last edited:

peterpl

Respected Member
Supporter
Certified
24/7/11
4,779
783
113
Good comparison and thanks for the detailed explanation. It does look like the VS movement is superior. (which I think most of us knew already).

To be fair the SH4131 movements for me have been rock solid and I have not seen many complaints or returns on this forum or any other popular rep forums. There are 1000s of these SH4131 movements out in our rep community now so we would already know if there was widespread issue.

Now the next items:

1) Can we drop the VSF movement directly into say a Clean Daytona? Will the hands and everything fit without issues?
2) VSF invested heavily on the movement, but they could improve their QC and also their dials to match at least Clean they would become the No.1 Daytona maker and they would have most of the market.
3) VSF need to improve their bracelets as well. To me they feel more rattling and also their tolerances are not as good as clean. Don't get me wrong VSF is doing a very good job. But if they want to be No1 Daytona maker they also need to up their Dial/case and Bracelet game.
 
Last edited:

DJ16013

Bettarini Case Fanatic
Supporter
Certified
8/8/11
1,071
5,892
113
Europe
Good comparison and thanks for the detailed explanation. It does look like the VS movement is superior. (which I think most of us knew already).

To be fair the SH4131 movements for me have been rock solid and I have not seen many complaints or returns on this forum or any other popular rep forums. There are 1000s of these SH4131 movements out in our rep community now so we would already know if there was widespread issue.

Now the next items:

1) Can we drop the VSF movement directly into say a Clean Daytona? Will the hands and everything fit without issues?
2) VSF invested heavily on the movement, but they could improve their QC and also their dials to match at least Clean they would become the No.1 Daytona maker and they would have most of the market.
3) VSF need to improve their bracelets as well. To me they feel more rattling and also their tolerances are not as good as clean. Don't get me wrong VSF is doing a very good job. But if they want to be No1 Daytona maker they also need to up their Dial/case and Bracelet game.
All valid points. If I am not mistaken also BTF has the DD and represent a good option.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dogwood

dogwood

I'm Pretty Popular
Patron
Section Moderator
Certified
7/9/21
2,468
5,525
113
Canada
Excellent review and breakdown @trustytime I'll be sure to link to this post from the Comprehensive guide the next time I make an edit.

It’s interesting to see how the original Chinese author of the comparison images hits on every point I typically bring up when comparing Dandong vs. Shanghai movements. Literally every one of these points is true when comparing the dd313X (aka vs313X) against sh313X (aka vr313X); the dd3285 against sh3285; or the dd4130 against sh4130.
  1. The DD typically has a higher percentage of parts that are compatible and can be swapped with gen.
  2. The balance bridge on the DD movements have a real paraflex shock absorber. The SH movements have a fake decoration plate with a low end Asian shock absorber underneath. NB: Shanghai has created an updated version of the SH4131, SH4130, SH3285, SH3235 / SH3230 (aka VR3235 / VR3230) which don’t use this fake decoration plate on the balance bridge. These v2 SH movements are the ones where you need to look at the chirality (direction of coil) of the hairspring to distinguish them from the DD movements.
  3. Shanghai movements never have an escape wheel shock absorber setting. Dandong movements (like gen) always do.
  4. Shaghai movements always skip the donut jewel on the bottom of the automatic works bridge. Dandong movements (like gen) always have this jewel.
  5. On movements that are supposed to have the skewed “Chonenergy” escapement (ie the 3230, 3235, 3285, and 4131) the Dandong movements all correctly copy the Rolex skewed pallet fork design, whereas Shaghai uses a standard T-shaped pallet fork. This obviously means there will be a difference in the design of the pallet bridge (what Andrew refers to as the “horseshoe”).
  6. The inclusion of pallet fork “banking pins” on the Shanghai design which are not present on the gen and Dandong design are another example of how well Dandong has cloned the movement and how Shanghai tends to cut corners and thus require additional structures to make their movements function adequately.
  7. BONUS: Something that wasn’t mentioned is that the DD4131 has a skeletonized escape wheel like gen, whereas the sh4131 doesn’t. Skeletonizing the escape wheel is hard engineering and manufacturing, but results in an escape wheel that is slightly lighter and that will accelerate and decelerate slightly more quickly.
  8. The OP notes that after disassembly and a full service it’s possible to get more amplitude out of a Dandong movement than our if a Shanghai movement. I’m not sure I agree with the numbers quoted — over 300 for a DD movement and struggling to get 200 for a Shanghai movement. But this statement points to a broader truth: Dandong clone movements are better than Shanghai clone movements in many areas including machining finish and tolerances on the parts. As a general rule, if you can afford to do so, you should buy a watch that has a Dandong, not a Shanghai clone Rolex movement.
Final thoughts: it’s clear to me after having serviced many Shanghai and Dandong movements that while they are both building movements to go into Rolex reps, they have different goals. The team at Dandong are trying to make the best possible Rolex clone movement and go the extra mile in ways that will never be visible unless you’re a watchmaker taking the movement apart. The Shanghai team have designed movements that look good, but once you start looking closer you can see that corners were cut. There’s room in the market for both Dandong and Shanghai, but it’s important for us as a community to know the difference. If you want quality and are willing to pay more, buy a rep with a Dandong movement. If you are more concerned about price, go with Shanghai but be aware of the shortcuts that were taken.
 
Last edited:

chrisat

Known Member
Supporter
Certified
23/3/24
141
150
43
AUT
If you want quality and are willing to pay more, buy a rep with a Dandong movement. If you are more concerned about price, go with Shanghai but be aware of the shortcuts that were taken.
I guess it's a bit more complex than that for the Daytonas - Clean with the SH4131 is actually more expensive than VSF and BTF with the DD4131. All available models have some flaws, but it's too bad that the one with the best overall appearance (CF) also happens to be the one with the worse movement. That said, I haven't really come across any actual complaints about the SH4131 yet, so despite its weaknesses it seems to be reasonably robust (as far as we can say that after just a year on the market).
 

dogwood

I'm Pretty Popular
Patron
Section Moderator
Certified
7/9/21
2,468
5,525
113
Canada
I guess it's a bit more complex than that for the Daytonas - Clean with the SH4131 is actually more expensive than VSF and BTF with the DD4131. All available models have some flaws, but it's too bad that the one with the best overall appearance (CF) also happens to be the one with the worse movement. That said, I haven't really come across any actual complaints about the SH4131 yet, so despite its weaknesses it seems to be reasonably robust (as far as we can say that after just a year on the market).
Yes it’s unfortunate that Clean wasn’t able to (or chose not to) use the DD4131 movement in their 12-series Daytonas.

Also, to be clear, I’m not saying the SH4131 is trash and nobody should ever buy a rep with that movement in it. The SH4131 movement by all appearances is a solid reliable movement. I’d say it’s very solid at to the VR3235 — a good albeit slightly inferior version of the VS3235.

We are spoiled for choice these days. We have the luxurious problem of having to choose between good (Shanghai) and excellent (Dandong).
 

MYHABIT89

Known Member
8/3/22
181
357
63
So the movement on the left with Vs and in the middle i guess DD is the same? Or vs make more improvements on DD 4131.im sure it is better SH 4131 im having both movements im sure DD is way far better.Maybe on WATCHSMITH can identify the different otherwise im happy with DD4131 so far.feels different day and night with SH i have first generation 7 months ago.
 

MYHABIT89

Known Member
8/3/22
181
357
63
Good comparison and thanks for the detailed explanation. It does look like the VS movement is superior. (which I think most of us knew already).

To be fair the SH4131 movements for me have been rock solid and I have not seen many complaints or returns on this forum or any other popular rep forums. There are 1000s of these SH4131 movements out in our rep community now so we would already know if there was widespread issue.

Now the next items:

1) Can we drop the VSF movement directly into say a Clean Daytona? Will the hands and everything fit without issues?
2) VSF invested heavily on the movement, but they could improve their QC and also their dials to match at least Clean they would become the No.1 Daytona maker and they would have most of the market.
3) VSF need to improve their bracelets as well. To me they feel more rattling and also their tolerances are not as good as clean. Don't get me wrong VSF is doing a very good job. But if they want to be No1 Daytona maker they also need to up their Dial/case and Bracelet game.
I would say Cf is knowing their issues with SH movement so they also improved quality of Crystal- Dial-Bracelet so buyers can be happy with their products but on the other side Vs is confident with their quality movement- crystal- Rehaut finished so they dont Mind to get small issues.but as the buyer which Factory you will prefer? Me VS ( i have both) i got clean because it was the only factory 7months ago.Clean needs to be improving their Rehaut it is 2024 now VS has much better appearance
 

Db9s

Active Member
12/5/23
251
160
43
Canada
It also doesn’t help that VSF Daytona lineup is extremely limited to a few models. They don’t have heavy versions either.

Its like they want us to go to other factories.
 

m5smg2

Mythical Poster
Patron
Certified
23/8/07
6,522
8,534
113
I’m not technical, but to put this in another view, the Clean 12 S4131 was said to be improved. Indeed, having several SH4131 since my CF126500 review I found them reliable and stable.

Bottom line, the (CF version) SH4131 is very good; the DD 4131 is simply better overall.
 
  • Like
Reactions: guru and Reaps

Newguyhere95

Getting To Know The Place
26/1/23
94
85
18
USA
Excellent review and breakdown @trustytime I'll be sure to link to this post from the Comprehensive guide the next time I make an edit.

It’s interesting to see how the original Chinese author of the comparison images hits on every point I typically bring up when comparing Dandong vs. Shanghai movements. Literally every one of these points is true when comparing the dd313X (aka vs313X) against sh313X (aka vr313X); the dd3285 against sh3285; or the dd4130 against sh4130.
  1. The DD typically has a higher percentage of parts that are compatible and can be swapped with gen.
  2. The balance bridge on the DD movements have a real paraflex shock absorber. The SH movements have a fake decoration plate with a low end Asian shock absorber underneath. NB: Shanghai has created an updated version of the SH4131, SH4130, SH3285, SH3235 / SH3230 (aka VR3235 / VR3230) which don’t use this fake decoration plate on the balance bridge. These v2 SH movements are the ones where you need to look at the chirality (direction of coil) of the hairspring to distinguish them from the DD movements.
  3. Shanghai movements never have an escape wheel shock absorber setting. Dandong movements (like gen) always do.
  4. Shaghai movements always skip the donut jewel on the bottom of the automatic works bridge. Dandong movements (like gen) always have this jewel.
  5. On movements that are supposed to have the skewed “Chonenergy” escapement (ie the 3230, 3235, 3285, and 4131) the Dandong movements all correctly copy the Rolex skewed pallet fork design, whereas Shaghai uses a standard T-shaped pallet fork. This obviously means there will be a difference in the design of the pallet bridge (what Andrew refers to as the “horseshoe”).
  6. The inclusion of pallet fork “banking pins” on the Shanghai design which are not present on the gen and Dandong design are another example of how well Dandong has cloned the movement and how Shanghai tends to cut corners and thus require additional structures to make their movements function adequately.
  7. BONUS: Something that wasn’t mentioned is that the DD4131 has a skeletonized escape wheel like gen, whereas the sh4131 doesn’t. Skeletonizing the escape wheel is hard engineering and manufacturing, but results in an escape wheel that is slightly lighter and that will accelerate and decelerate slightly more quickly.
  8. The OP notes that after disassembly and a full service it’s possible to get more amplitude out of a Dandong movement than our if a Shanghai movement. I’m not sure I agree with the numbers quoted — over 300 for a DD movement and struggling to get 200 for a Shanghai movement. But this statement points to a broader truth: Dandong clone movements are better than Shanghai clone movements in many areas including machining finish and tolerances on the parts. As a general rule, if you can afford to do so, you should buy a watch that has a Dandong, not a Shanghai clone Rolex movement.
Final thoughts: it’s clear to me after having serviced many Shanghai and Dandong movements that while they are both building movements to go into Rolex reps, they have different goals. The team at Dandong are trying to make the best possible Rolex clone movement and go the extra mile in ways that will never be visible unless you’re a watchmaker taking the movement apart. The Shanghai team have designed movements that look good, but once you start looking closer you can see that corners were cut. There’s room in the market for both Dandong and Shanghai, but it’s important for us as a community to know the difference. If you want quality and are willing to pay more, buy a rep with a Dandong movement. If you are more concerned about price, go with Shanghai but be aware of the shortcuts that were taken.
You clear my mind! Thanks 🙏
 

Uhr70

I'm Pretty Popular
Patron
Certified
7/9/13
2,991
1,096
113
Las Vegas
I have owned several Daytona 126500 from CF with the SH4131. Still own a few, and all of the ones I have personally tested, run very stably at -1 / +3 with amplitudes between 278-303 and a BE of 0.0 - 0.1. As far as I am concerned, the SH4131 has been a star!
 

dogwood

I'm Pretty Popular
Patron
Section Moderator
Certified
7/9/21
2,468
5,525
113
Canada
I have owned several Daytona 126500 from CF with the SH4131. Still own a few, and all of the ones I have personally tested, run very stably at -1 / +3 with amplitudes between 278-303 and a BE of 0.0 - 0.1. As far as I am concerned, the SH4131 has been a star!
Indeed. The SH4131 and the SH4130 on which it’s based aren’t bad movements at all. In fact they’re good movements. They’re reliable.

My only issues were with the v1 of both which had the fake hairspring stud decoration on the balance bridge which made servicing the balance bridge shock setting difficult. The v2 of the SH413x movements have eliminated this fake decoration and switched to a true paraflex shock setting.

The only real differences that exists between the DD and SH versions at this point are:
  1. The part finishing on the DD movement is better; cleaner surface finish (ie made on cnc machines with better bearings, sharper tooling, and more optimized feeds & speeds for cutting).
  2. The SH versions don’t have a shock setting fit the escape wheel. This isn’t a big deal. The escape wheel is very light so it’s unlikely that a hard knock will damage the pivots. But the DD has a shock setting for the escape wheel pivots like the gen.
  3. On the 4131 movement, the DD version uses the genlike chronenergy escapement geometry (skewed pallet fork) like the gen 4131. The SH4131 doesn’t use the gen like design. This means that for anybody wanting to build a franken 12-series Daytona with a gen balance, the only option is the DD4131 since the SH4131 won’t accept a gen balance conplete.